نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorG.samar, Rezaen_US
dc.contributor.authorShayestefar, Parvaneen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T10:29:01Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T10:29:01Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T10:29:01Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T10:29:01Z
dc.date.issued2008-12-01en_US
dc.date.issued1387-09-11fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2014-01-26en_US
dc.date.submitted1392-11-06fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationG.samar, Reza, Shayestefar, Parvane. (2008). Corrective Feedback in EFL Classrooms: Learner Negotiation Strategies and Uptake. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(212), 107-134.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2251-7995
dc.identifier.issn2676-6876
dc.identifier.urihttps://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_642.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/382519
dc.description.abstractThis quasi-experimental study examines the extent to which research findings from teacher Corrective Feedbacks (CFs) and SLA concerning the efficiency of Focus-on-Form (FoF) pedagogy is transferable to the context of foreign language learning in Iranian schools. To investigate how "grammar instruction with FoF-oriented error treatment" functions as a matrix in which English  learning takes place, transcripts of learners' interactions in two communicatively-based high school classes were analyzed using Lyster & Ranta's taxonomy of CFs moves (Experimental Group (EXG) received CFs but provision of CFs in Control Group (CG) was not aimed). Findings reveal that all six types of CFs defined in literature were enjoyed by the present EFL teacher with a tendency to use "metalinguistic" or the overall "student-generated repairs" more than "recasts". The frequency and distribution of EFL teacher's CF types together with the frequency and distribution of different types of learner uptake following each CF type are discussed. The results highlight the endorsement of FoF pedagogy in EFL contexts and bring to light the efficacy of teacher CFs on the learner uptake. The study is unique as it adds an important layer to teacher CF and SLA research by further accounting for differences between EXG and CG in terms of negotiation strategiesen_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Tabrizen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه تبریزfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of English Language Teaching and Learningen_US
dc.relation.ispartofمجله مطالعات آموزش و فراگیری زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه تبریزfa_IR
dc.subject: Corrective Feedbacken_US
dc.subjectcommunication strategiesen_US
dc.subjectincidental Focus-on-Formen_US
dc.subjectForm-Focused Instructionen_US
dc.subjectuptakeen_US
dc.titleCorrective Feedback in EFL Classrooms: Learner Negotiation Strategies and Uptakeen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAssistant professor at the tarbiat modares university of tehranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentph.d candidate at the tarbiat modares university of tehranen_US
dc.citation.volume1
dc.citation.issue212
dc.citation.spage107
dc.citation.epage134


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد