• ثبت نام
    • ورود به سامانه
    مشاهده مورد 
    •   صفحهٔ اصلی
    • نشریات انگلیسی
    • Energy Equipment and Systems
    • Volume 5, Issue 2
    • مشاهده مورد
    •   صفحهٔ اصلی
    • نشریات انگلیسی
    • Energy Equipment and Systems
    • Volume 5, Issue 2
    • مشاهده مورد
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Exergy , economy and pressure drop analyses for optimal design of recuperator used in microturbine

    (ندگان)پدیدآور
    Hanafizadeh, PedramMaghsoudi, Peyman
    Thumbnail
    دریافت مدرک مشاهده
    FullText
    اندازه فایل: 
    1.303 مگابایت
    نوع فايل (MIME): 
    PDF
    نوع مدرک
    Text
    Research Paper
    زبان مدرک
    English
    نمایش کامل رکورد
    چکیده
    The optimal design of a plate-fin recuperator of a 200-kW microturbine was studied in this paper. The exergy efficiency, pressure drop and total cost were selected as the three important objective functions of the recuperator. Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) were respectively employed for single-objective and multi-objective optimizations. By optimizing the objective functions via the single-objective optimization approach, the optimum values of exergy efficiency, pressure drop and total cost were found to be 0.966, 0.846 kPa, and 302,075$ respectively, representing the best solutions obtained from 20 iterations in GA. The cases considered for bi-objective optimizations were exergy efficiency-total cost, exergy efficiency-pressure drop and total cost-pressure drop pairs for which Pareto-optimal fronts were obtained, revealing the confliction between the two objectives in each pair. Later, a three-objective optimization was undertaken to simultaneously maximize exergy efficiency while minimizing pressure drop and total cost; the results were presented in a three-dimensional Pareto-optimal front. Moreover, the results of the multi-objective optimizations (i.e. three-objective and bi-objective optimizations) were compared with those of the single-objective one. The comparisons indicated a very good match between the multi-objective and the single-objective optimum values when it came to exergy efficiency and total cost; for pressure drop, however, significant differences were observed. Eventually, a decision-making procedure was employed for the Pareto-fronts of multi-objective optimization to find the final optimal solution.
    کلید واژگان
    Recuperator
    Microturbine
    genetic algorithm
    Multi-objective optimization
    decision-making

    شماره نشریه
    2
    تاریخ نشر
    2017-06-01
    1396-03-11
    ناشر
    University of Tehran
    سازمان پدید آورنده
    Center of Excellence in Design and Optimization of Energy Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, P. O. Box: 11155-4563, Tehran, Iran
    Center of Excellence in Design and Optimization of Energy Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, P. O. Box: 11155-4563, Tehran, Iran

    شاپا
    2383-1111
    2345-251X
    URI
    https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/ees.2017.25717
    http://www.energyequipsys.com/article_25717.html
    https://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/95136

    مرور

    همه جای سامانهپایگاه‌ها و مجموعه‌ها بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌هااین مجموعه بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌ها

    حساب من

    ورود به سامانهثبت نام

    آمار

    مشاهده آمار استفاده

    تازه ترین ها

    تازه ترین مدارک
    © کليه حقوق اين سامانه برای سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی ایران محفوظ است
    تماس با ما | ارسال بازخورد
    قدرت یافته توسطسیناوب