• ثبت نام
    • ورود به سامانه
    مشاهده مورد 
    •   صفحهٔ اصلی
    • نشریات انگلیسی
    • Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
    • Volume 2, Issue 1
    • مشاهده مورد
    •   صفحهٔ اصلی
    • نشریات انگلیسی
    • Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
    • Volume 2, Issue 1
    • مشاهده مورد
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparing the effects of pethidine and diclofenac suppository on patients with renal colic in the emergency department

    (ندگان)پدیدآور
    Taherinia, AliShahsavari, SoodehHeidarpour, AzadehTabatabaii, Seyyed MohammadVahdat, Afsson
    Thumbnail
    دریافت مدرک مشاهده
    FullText
    اندازه فایل: 
    202.6کیلوبایت
    نوع فايل (MIME): 
    PDF
    نوع مدرک
    Text
    Original Article
    زبان مدرک
    English
    نمایش کامل رکورد
    چکیده
    Objective: Renal colic is a common cause of emergency room visits. Due to the spontaneous passage of more than 90% of kidney stones, treatment in the emergency department (ED) is limited to pain control. Analgesics currently used are selected based on physician experiences and various theories from different sources. The aim of this study was to compare the common drugs (pethidine and diclofenac) used for renal colic in Iran.  Methods: In this single-blinded randomized clinical trial, 90 patients with renal colic who referred to the ED of Imam Reza hospital in Kermanshah were randomly assigned to each of 3 treatments including pethidine suppository (50 mg, iv), diclofenac suppository (50 mg), and a combination of pethidine and diclofenac suppository. In this regard, the response to treatment and duration of hospitalization were compared.  Results: The best medicine to relieve pain intensity in patients under 25 years was diclofenac suppository. In patients in the age range of 25-45 years, pethidine and diclofenac were the best choice. Conversely, in patients older than 45 years, pethidine was the best treatment. We could also observe a decrease in the length of hospitalization in patients who received pethidine.   Conclusion: It can be concluded that morphine is more appropriate to control pain and reduce the length of hospitalization in patients with renal colic.   Clinical Trial Registration: irct.ir Identifier: IRCT20101214538
    کلید واژگان
    Renal colic
    Emergency Department
    Pain relief
    Anesthesiology
    Clinical Toxicology
    emergency nursing

    شماره نشریه
    1
    تاریخ نشر
    2016-01-01
    1394-10-11
    ناشر
    Kerman University of Medical Sciences
    سازمان پدید آورنده
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
    Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Students Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
    School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
    Department of Medical Informatics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Students Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
    Clinical Research Development Unit, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    شاپا
    2383-4544
    URI
    https://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jept.2015.02
    http://www.jept.ir/article_10757.html
    https://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/68009

    مرور

    همه جای سامانهپایگاه‌ها و مجموعه‌ها بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌هااین مجموعه بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌ها

    حساب من

    ورود به سامانهثبت نام

    آمار

    مشاهده آمار استفاده

    تازه ترین ها

    تازه ترین مدارک
    © کليه حقوق اين سامانه برای سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی ایران محفوظ است
    تماس با ما | ارسال بازخورد
    قدرت یافته توسطسیناوب