• ورود به سامانه
      مشاهده مورد 
      •   صفحهٔ اصلی
      • نشریات انگلیسی
      • Iranian Heart Journal
      • Volume 19, Issue 2
      • مشاهده مورد
      •   صفحهٔ اصلی
      • نشریات انگلیسی
      • Iranian Heart Journal
      • Volume 19, Issue 2
      • مشاهده مورد
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Comparison of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Measurements by Echocardiography and Contrast Ventriculography: A Study on a Large Hospitalized Population

      (ندگان)پدیدآور
      Sadeghian, HakimehNematipour, EbrahimKazemi Saeid, AliLotfi-Tokaldany, MasomehGhaffari-Marandi, NedaHakki Kazazi, ElhamMahmoodian, MehranAbbasi, Seyed Hesameddin
      Thumbnail
      دریافت مدرک مشاهده
      FullText
      اندازه فایل: 
      766.2کیلوبایت
      نوع فايل (MIME): 
      PDF
      نوع مدرک
      Text
      زبان مدرک
      English
      نمایش کامل رکورد
      چکیده
      Background: The evaluation of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is important for predictingmortality and identifying high-risk patients. We aimed to identify factors affecting the variationin the LVEF measurement via echocardiography and contrast left ventriculography (CVG).Methods: A total of 4422 patients (mean age=59.0±10.52 y, range=22–88) who underwentechocardiography and CVG within the same hospitalization period (0- to 14-day intervals) wereincluded. Data were obtained from the Echocardiography Data Bank and the CoronaryAngiography Data Bank in Tehran Heart Center.Results: The correlation between the estimation of the EF by echocardiography and CVG was good(r=0.716); however, there was no point-by-point agreement. In 21.5% of the patients,echocardiography and CVG estimated the EF equally, and a difference greater than 20% wasfound in 1.8% of the patients. The differences between the 2 measurements were remarkableeither in the patients with EFs greater than 50% or in those with EFs of 50% or less by CVG(59.71±3.72 by CVG vs 55.96±7.57% by echocardiography in EFs>50% and 40.69±8.96 by50% and 40.69±8.96 byCVG vs 43.90±10.71% by echocardiography in EFs≤50%). By linear regression analysis, thepresence of pathologic Q wave, atrial fibrillation and left bundle branch block, moderate andsevere mitral regurgitation, increased LV size, and increased interventricular septal diameterresulted in a higher EF value via CVG, whereas in those with EFs of 50% or less, the EF byechocardiography was higher. No effect of time gap between the measurements was found.Conclusions: According to our study, the EF measurements obtained by echocardiography and CVGvaried on an individual basis. The level of the EF was the most important factor correlating withthe difference between the measurements by the methods.
      کلید واژگان
      echocardiography
      Contrast ventriculography
      Ejection fraction

      شماره نشریه
      2
      تاریخ نشر
      2018-06-01
      1397-03-11
      ناشر
      Iranian Heart Association
      سازمان پدید آورنده
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr Shariati Hospital, Tehran, IR Iran
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr Shariati Hospital, Tehran, IR Iran
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Sina Hospital, Tehran, IR Iran.
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr Shariati Hospital, Tehran, IR Iran
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr Shariati Hospital, Tehran, IR Iran
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr Shariati Hospital, Tehran, IR Iran
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr Shariati Hospital, Tehran, IR Iran
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr Shariati Hospital, Tehran, IR Iran

      URI
      http://journal.iha.org.ir/article_82811.html
      https://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/42339

      مرور

      همه جای سامانهپایگاه‌ها و مجموعه‌ها بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌هااین مجموعه بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌ها

      حساب من

      ورود به سامانهثبت نام

      تازه ترین ها

      تازه ترین مدارک
      © کليه حقوق اين سامانه برای سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی ایران محفوظ است
      تماس با ما | ارسال بازخورد
      قدرت یافته توسطسیناوب