نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorHeidari, Farrokhlaghaen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T08:40:21Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T08:40:21Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T08:40:21Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T08:40:21Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-01en_US
dc.date.issued1398-07-09fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2020-06-06en_US
dc.date.submitted1399-03-17fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationHeidari, Farrokhlagha. (2019). The Effect of Dynamic Assessment of Toulmin Model through Teacher- and Collective-Scaffolding on Argument Structure and Argumentative Writing Achievement of Iranian EFL Learners. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 11(2), 115-140. doi: 10.22111/ijals.2019.5445en_US
dc.identifier.issn2008-5494
dc.identifier.issn2322-3650
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2019.5445
dc.identifier.urihttps://ijals.usb.ac.ir/article_5445.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/346035
dc.description.abstractConsidering the paramount importance of writing logical arguments for college students, this study investigated the effect of dynamic assessment (DA) of Toulmin model through teacher- and collective-scaffolding on argument structure and overall quality of argumentative essays of Iranian EFL university learners. In so doing, 45 male and female Iranian EFL learners taking part in the study were randomly assigned into three groups ( two experimental groups including teacher- and collective-scaffolding and one control group), each consisting of 15 learners. Toulmin Model of argumentation was used as an instructional tool in this research. The necessary data were collected through a pre- and post-test argumentative essay. During the experiment, the dynamic assessment groups wrote and revised their essays in response to teacher's or peers' supportive dialogue and zone of proximal development (ZPD) sensitive feedback on the argument structure of their essays; whereas, the control group did not receive such mediation and they were evaluated on their own independent performance. The results of statistical analyses carried out on post-test scores on argument structure and overall quality of the essays pointed out to the outperformance of the teacher- and collective-scaffolding groups on both variables. Furthermore, follow-up Post-hoc analyses revealed no significant difference between the teacher- and collective-scaffolding groups in terms of the overall quality of the argumentative essays. However, the statistically significant difference between the two experimental groups with regard to the argument structure indicated the outperformance of the teacher-scaffolding over the collective group. The obtained results support the fact that autonomy and improvement cannot be thrust upon learners, rather they need to be assisted wisely towards independence.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Sistan and Baluchestanen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIranian Journal of Applied Language Studiesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2019.5445
dc.subjectDynamic Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectToulmin Modelen_US
dc.subjectTeacher-Scaffoldingen_US
dc.subjectCollective-Scaffoldingen_US
dc.subjectArgument Structureen_US
dc.subjectArgumentative Writing Achievementen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Dynamic Assessment of Toulmin Model through Teacher- and Collective-Scaffolding on Argument Structure and Argumentative Writing Achievement of Iranian EFL Learnersen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iranen_US
dc.citation.volume11
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage115
dc.citation.epage140


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد