• ورود به سامانه
      مشاهده مورد 
      •   صفحهٔ اصلی
      • نشریات انگلیسی
      • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
      • Volume 19, Issue 6
      • مشاهده مورد
      •   صفحهٔ اصلی
      • نشریات انگلیسی
      • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
      • Volume 19, Issue 6
      • مشاهده مورد
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Willingness to Pay for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Effect of Copayment in Southern Thailand

      (ندگان)پدیدآور
      Saengow, UdomsakBirch, StephenGeater, AlanChongsuwiwatvong, Virasakdi
      Thumbnail
      دریافت مدرک مشاهده
      FullText
      اندازه فایل: 
      349.0کیلوبایت
      نوع فايل (MIME): 
      PDF
      نوع مدرک
      Text
      Research Articles
      زبان مدرک
      English
      نمایش کامل رکورد
      چکیده
      Background: The incidence rate of colorectal cancer in Thailand is increasing. Hence, the nationwide screeningprogramme with copayment is being considered. There are two proposed screening alternatives: annual fecalimmunochemical test (FIT) and once-in-10-year colonoscopy. A copayment for FIT is 60 Thai baht (THB) per test(≈ 1.7 USD); a copayment for colonoscopy is 2,300 THB per test (≈ 65.5 USD). Methods: The willingness to pay(WTP) technique, which is theoretically founded on a cost-benefit analysis, was used to assess an effect of copayment onthe uptake. Subjects were patients aged 50-69 years without cancer or screening experience. WTP for the proposedtests was elicited. Results: Nearly two thirds of subjects were willing to pay for FIT. Less than half of subjects werewilling to pay for colonoscopy. Among them, median WTP for both tests was greater than the proposed copayments.In a probit model, knowing CRC patient and presence of companion were associated with non-zero WTP for FIT.Presence of companion, female, and family history of cancer were associated with non-zero WTP for colonoscopy.After adjustment for starting price in the linear model, marital status, drinking behavior, and risk attitude were associatedwith WTP. None of factors was significant for colonoscopy. Uptake decreased as levels of copayment increased.At proposed copayments, the uptake rates of 59.8% and 21.6% were estimated for colonoscopy and FIT respectively.The demand for FIT was price inelastic; the demand for colonoscopy was price elastic. Estimates of optimal copaymentwere 62.1 THB for FIT and 460.2 THB for colonoscopy. At the optimal copayment, uptake rates would be 59.8%for FIT and 42.3% for colonoscopy.Conclusion(s): More subjects were willing to pay for FIT than for colonoscopy(59.0% versus 46.5%). The estimated uptake rates were 59.8% and 21.6% for colonoscopy and FIT at the proposedcopayments.
      کلید واژگان
      colorectal cancer
      Screening
      Willingness to pay
      Copayment
      Thailand
      Health economy

      شماره نشریه
      6
      تاریخ نشر
      2018-06-01
      1397-03-11
      ناشر
      West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention (WAOCP)
      سازمان پدید آورنده
      Center of Excellence in Health System and Medical Research (CE-HSMR), Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.
      Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
      Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.
      Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

      شاپا
      1513-7368
      2476-762X
      URI
      https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.6.1727
      http://journal.waocp.org/article_63267.html
      https://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/33394

      مرور

      همه جای سامانهپایگاه‌ها و مجموعه‌ها بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌هااین مجموعه بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌ها

      حساب من

      ورود به سامانهثبت نام

      تازه ترین ها

      تازه ترین مدارک
      © کليه حقوق اين سامانه برای سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی ایران محفوظ است
      تماس با ما | ارسال بازخورد
      قدرت یافته توسطسیناوب