نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authormei, wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Fangen_US
dc.contributor.authorzhen, jiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorYu, Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorguo, xingjieen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T06:57:32Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T06:57:32Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T06:57:32Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T06:57:32Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-01en_US
dc.date.issued1393-03-11fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2012-09-25en_US
dc.date.submitted1391-07-04fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationmei, wang, Li, Fang, zhen, jiang, Yu, Li, guo, xingjie. (2014). Chiral recognition mechanisms of four β-blockers by HPLC with Amylose Chiral Stationary Phase. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 13(2), 449-457. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2014.1491en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-0328
dc.identifier.issn1726-6890
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2014.1491
dc.identifier.urihttp://ijpr.sbmu.ac.ir/article_1491.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/312770
dc.description.abstractThe high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) enantioseparation of four β-blocking agents metoprolol, bisoprolol, propranolol and atenolol was performed on amylose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) chiral stationary phase using n-hexane-ethanol-diethylamine (DEA) as the mobile phase and related chiral recognition mechanisms were discussed. Enantiomeric separation of the fourβ-blockers was a result of more than one type of interaction between solutes and CSP. Besides hydrogen bonding, there was another type interaction that was independent of solvent polarity and responsible for enantiomeric selectivity, such as π-π interactions. Both the groups close to the chiral centers and the substituent groups on the phenyl rings, which were far away from the chiral centers, could contribute to the good separation. The separations of the four β-blocker enantiomers were all enthalpy driven process. In the range of 293–308K(20–35℃), as the temperature increased, the retention as well as the resolution decreased. The molecular size rather than concentration of the alcohol modifiers affected the resolution and retention.en_US
dc.format.extent1125
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSchool of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Researchen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2014.1491
dc.subjectβ-blockersen_US
dc.subjectchiral recognition mechanismen_US
dc.subjectChiralpak AD-Hen_US
dc.subjectHPLCen_US
dc.subjectPharmacuticsen_US
dc.subjectPharmacyen_US
dc.titleChiral recognition mechanisms of four β-blockers by HPLC with Amylose Chiral Stationary Phaseen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeResearch articleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBox 39 School of Pharmacy Shenyang Pharmaceutical University 103 Wenhua Road Shenyang 110016, People’s Republic of China.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentBox 39 School of Pharmacy Shenyang Pharmaceutical University 103 Wenhua Road Shenyang 110016, People’s Republic of China.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentBox 39 School of Pharmacy Shenyang Pharmaceutical University 103 Wenhua Road Shenyang 110016, People’s Republic of China.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentBox 39 School of Pharmacy Shenyang Pharmaceutical University 103 Wenhua Road Shenyang 110016, People’s Republic of Chinaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentXingjie Guo Box 39 School of Pharmacy Shenyang Pharmaceutical University 103 Wenhua Road Shenyang 110016, People’s Republic of China.en_US
dc.citation.volume13
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage449
dc.citation.epage457


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد