Effect of Three Common Desensitizers in Reduction of the Dentin Hypersensitivity after Periodontal Surgery

Abstract

AbstractStatement of Problem: Dentin hypersensitivity is one of the most commoncomplaints of patients after periodontal treatments which occur after tissueshrinkage.Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the effectivenessof sensikin gel (10% potassium nitrate and 0.22% sodium fluoride) with sodiumfluoride gel (2.7%) and fluoride varnish (5%) in reducing the dentin hypersensitivityafter periodontal surgery.Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients who, after full mouth periodontalsurgery, had a complaint of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in at least threequadrants were selected. Then a specific treatment was randomly selected foreach quadrant which was applied once a day for one week and then stopped.A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the subjects’ responses to airblast and periodontal probe stimuli at baseline at one week, and one, three and6 months after treatment. To analyze the data, repeated measures ANOVA test,Tukey test and variance analysis test were used.Results: At all given intervals, almost both sodium fluoride and sensikin gelsignificantly reduced the dental sensitivity caused by stimulants. There wereno significant differences between sensikin gel and other two desensitizers inreducing the dentin hypersensitivity after 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6months with respect to air blast stimuli. Sensikin gel was more efficient thanFluoride varnish in reducing the sensitivity caused by periodontal probe after 1month.Conclusions: Sensikin gel, sodium fluoride gel and fluoride varnish can all beprescribed to reduce dental sensitivity in patients who have undergoneperiodontal treatments. In the case of severe sensitivity to mechanicalstimulations, a treatment with a long-run effectiveness such as sensikin and/orsodium fluoride gel is preferred. Statement of Problem: Dentin hypersensitivity is one of the most commoncomplaints of patients after periodontal treatments which occur after tissueshrinkage.Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the effectivenessof sensikin gel (10% potassium nitrate and 0.22% sodium fluoride) with sodiumfluoride gel (2.7%) and fluoride varnish (5%) in reducing the dentin hypersensitivityafter periodontal surgery.Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients who, after full mouth periodontalsurgery, had a complaint of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in at least threequadrants were selected. Then a specific treatment was randomly selected foreach quadrant which was applied once a day for one week and then stopped.A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the subjects’ responses to airblast and periodontal probe stimuli at baseline at one week, and one, three and6 months after treatment. To analyze the data, repeated measures ANOVA test,Tukey test and variance analysis test were used.Results: At all given intervals, almost both sodium fluoride and sensikin gelsignificantly reduced the dental sensitivity caused by stimulants. There wereno significant differences between sensikin gel and other two desensitizers inreducing the dentin hypersensitivity after 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6months with respect to air blast stimuli. Sensikin gel was more efficient thanFluoride varnish in reducing the sensitivity caused by periodontal probe after 1month.Conclusions: Sensikin gel, sodium fluoride gel and fluoride varnish can all beprescribed to reduce dental sensitivity in patients who have undergoneperiodontal treatments. In the case of severe sensitivity to mechanicalstimulations, a treatment with a long-run effectiveness such as sensikin and/orsodium fluoride gel is preferred.