Lexical Bundles in English Review Articles

Abstract

This study was an attempt to shed light on the formulaic nature of the language of theoretical review articles. The study was based on a corpus of 517 English review articles from linguistics and applied linguistics disciplines. Following a corpus-driven discourse analytic approach, we identified four-word bundles occurring at least 20 times per million words in at least five different articles and investigated their structural and functional features. The results showed that the dominance of text-oriented and phrasal bundles, especially framing signals and prepositional phrases, indicates the highly informational nature of review articles in linguistics and applied linguistics and the importance of organizational features of discourse in articles. Moreover, the low proportion of participant-oriented bundles and resultative signals implies the writer's avoidance to make claims and interpretations in English review articles. Additionally, the varied and frequent use of the anticipatory-<em>it</em> structure among clausal bundles, the low proportion of engagement bundles, and the fact that this dialogic feature of article writing was conveyed through an impersonal construction point to the writer's reluctance to explicitly show commitment to his/her evaluations. Finally, expressing stance through anticipatory-<em>it</em> constructions and shell nouns indicates the writer's intention to hide or foreground authorial observations, interpretations, and claims.