نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorSadeghi, Vahiden_US
dc.contributor.authorTaghavi, Farnaz Sadaten_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T00:44:26Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T00:44:27Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T00:44:26Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T00:44:27Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-01en_US
dc.date.issued1393-07-09fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2014-06-16en_US
dc.date.submitted1393-03-26fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationSadeghi, Vahid, Taghavi, Farnaz Sadat. (2014). Acoustic Analysis of Persian EFL Learners' Pronunciation of English Vowels. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 33(3), 135-153. doi: 10.22099/jtls.2015.2899en_US
dc.identifier.issn2008-8191
dc.identifier.issn2717-1604
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2015.2899
dc.identifier.urihttp://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_2899.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/184425
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports the results of an experimental study on non-native production of English vowels. Two groups of Persian EFL learners varying in language proficiency were tested on their ability to produce the nine plain vowels of American English. Vowel production accuracy was assessed by means of acoustic measurements. Ladefoged and Maddison's (1996) F1 F2 measurements for American English vowel space were used as reference values to be compared with the measurements obtained from the production of Persian EFL learners. The acoustic measurements revealed that learners were not able to control acoustic parameters of vowel quality, even for the more similar vowels in the two languages, in a native-like manner due to interference from their native vowel system. Spectral accuracy measures also did not progress toward more native-like values in the productions of the more proficient learners. Interestingly, the positions achieved for the more dissimilar vowels were neither close to their closest L1 counterparts nor close to their native categories. Interpreting this latter result within the Perceptual Assimilation Model proposed by Best (1994), it could be stated that learners established new phonetic categories for the vowel contrasts that were not used in their native phonological system.en_US
dc.format.extent313
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShiraz Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Teaching Language Skillsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2015.2899
dc.subjectEnglish and Persian Vowel Spacesen_US
dc.subjectFormant Frequenciesen_US
dc.subjectLanguage Categoryen_US
dc.subjectSpeech Learning Modelen_US
dc.subjectPerceptual Assimilation Modelen_US
dc.titleAcoustic Analysis of Persian EFL Learners' Pronunciation of English Vowelsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Humanity, Department of Language Teaching Imam Khomeini International University Qazvin, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Humanity, Department of Language Teaching Rasht Branch, Payam Noor University, Rasht, Iran fs.taghavi@yahoo.comen_US
dc.citation.volume33
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.spage135
dc.citation.epage153


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد