نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorBaleghizadeh, Sasanen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbbasi, Maryamen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T00:44:21Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T00:44:21Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T00:44:21Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T00:44:21Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-01en_US
dc.date.issued1392-06-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2013-01-05en_US
dc.date.submitted1391-10-16fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationBaleghizadeh, Sasan, Abbasi, Maryam. (2013). The Effect of Four Different Types of Involvement Indices on Vocabulary Learning and Retention of EFL Learners. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 32(2), 1-26. doi: 10.22099/jtls.2013.1521en_US
dc.identifier.issn2008-8191
dc.identifier.issn2717-1604
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2013.1521
dc.identifier.urihttp://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_1521.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/184395
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study was to provide empirical support for the construct of the involvement load hypothesis (ILH ) in an EFL context. To fulfill the purpose of the study, 4 intact groups consisting of 126 intermediate-level students participated in this experiment. In order to ensure that the participants were at the same level of English language proficiency, the Nelson test was administered prior to the treatment. Moreover, the participants were pretested on the knowledge of the target items through the Vocabulary Knowledge Scale (VKS). During the 7 treatment sessions, the 4 groups were treated with different tasks (reading, fill-in-the-blanks, sentence-writing, and composition-writing) varying in the involvement index according to the ILH. The VKS was administered twice (immediate and delayed posttests) to measure the gain degree at receptive and productive levels. The results indicated the validity of the hypothesis in receptive and productive learning and receptive retention. In productive retention, however, partial support for the hypothesis was provided. In addition, vocabulary gain in partially known, receptive, and productive categories could lend support to the effectiveness of each treatment over time.en_US
dc.format.extent275
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShiraz Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Teaching Language Skillsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2013.1521
dc.subjectVocabularyen_US
dc.subjectInvolvement Load Hypothesis (ILH)en_US
dc.subjectthe involvement indexen_US
dc.subjectEFLen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Four Different Types of Involvement Indices on Vocabulary Learning and Retention of EFL Learnersen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAssociate Professor Shahid Beheshti University, Tehranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentShahid Beheshti Universityen_US
dc.citation.volume32
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage1
dc.citation.epage26


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد