Poring Over Metadiscourse Use in Discussion and Conclusion Sections of Academic Articles Written by Iranian ESP Students
(ندگان)پدیدآور
Sarani, AbdullahKhoshsima, HooshangIzadi, Mehriنوع مدرک
TextResearch Article
زبان مدرک
Englishچکیده
This study investigated the employment of interactional metadisocurse in English academic articles written by Iranian ESP students. Data consisted of a total of 66 academic articles written in English by nonhumanities and humanities writers. Discussion and Conclusion sections were extracted, and Hyland's (2005) taxonomy was borrowed for analysis. The use of hedges, boosters, and attitude markers was compared in the articles. Total number of each metadiscourse marker was counted, and the differences were checked running Mann-Whitney U test. Analysis revealed that there were disciplinary differences in the use of markers by nonhumanities and humanities. Hedges and attitude markers were more frequent in the humanities' articles, rather than the nonhumanities' articles. Also, the use of hedges and boosters was statistically significant. Pedagogical implications are discussed in light of the empirical data.
کلید واژگان
Interactional MetadiscourseNonhumanities
Humanities
Discussion and Conclusion Sections
شماره نشریه
1تاریخ نشر
2017-04-011396-01-12
ناشر
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvazسازمان پدید آورنده
University of Sistan and BaluchestanChabahar Maritime University, Chabahar,Iran.
English Language Department, Chabahar Maritime University
شاپا
2345-33032588-3887




