نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorGholi Mezerji, Naseren_US
dc.contributor.authorRafeie, Mohammaden_US
dc.contributor.authorShayan, Zahraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMosayebi, Ghasemen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-08T20:50:03Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T20:50:04Z
dc.date.available1399-07-08T20:50:03Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-29T20:50:04Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-01en_US
dc.date.issued1394-01-12fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2015-04-25en_US
dc.date.submitted1394-02-05fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationGholi Mezerji, Naser, Rafeie, Mohammad, Shayan, Zahra, Mosayebi, Ghasem. (2015). The Diagnostic Value of Surface Markers in Acute Appendicitis; A Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma, 3(2), 65-69.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2322-2522
dc.identifier.issn2322-3960
dc.identifier.urihttps://beat.sums.ac.ir/article_44288.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/96995
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the diagnostic value of blood cells surface markers in patients with acute appendicitis. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 71 patients who underwent appendectomy following a diagnosis of appendicitis were recruited during a one-year period. The patients were divided into two groups: patients with histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis and subjects with normal appendix. Blood cell surface markers of all patients were measured. Univariate and multivariate analytical methods were applied to identify the most useful markers. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were also used to find the best cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity.Results: Overall we included 71 patients with mean age of 22.6±10.7 years. Of the 71 cases, 45 (63.4%) had acute appendicitis while 26 (36.6%) were normal. There was no significant difference between two study groups regarding the age ( p=0.151) and sex ( p=0.142). The initial WBC count was significantly higher in those with acute appendicitis ( p=0.033). Maximum and minimum area under the ROC curve in univariate analysis was reported for CD3/RA (0.71) and CD38 (0.533), respectively. Multivariate regression models revealed the percentage of accurate diagnoses based on the combination of g/d TCR, CD3/RO, and CD3/RA markers to be 74.65%. Maximum area under the ROC curve (0.79) was also obtained for the same combination.Conclusion: the best blood cell surface markers in the prediction of acute appendicitis were HLA-DR+CD19, α/b TCR, and CD3/RA. The simultaneous use of g/d TCR, CD3/RA, and CD3/RO showed the highest diagnostic value in acute appendicitis.en_US
dc.format.extent748
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShiraz University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of Emergency And Traumaen_US
dc.subjectBlood cell surface markersen_US
dc.subjectAcute Appendicitisen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic Accuracyen_US
dc.subjectROC curveen_US
dc.titleThe Diagnostic Value of Surface Markers in Acute Appendicitis; A Diagnostic Accuracy Studyen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhD, Assistant Professor of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iranen_US
dc.citation.volume3
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage65
dc.citation.epage69


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد