نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorYu, X.Z.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLu, M.R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-08T20:36:44Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T20:36:45Z
dc.date.available1399-07-08T20:36:44Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-29T20:36:45Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-01en_US
dc.date.issued1395-09-11fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2016-05-23en_US
dc.date.submitted1395-03-03fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationYu, X.Z., Lu, M.R.. (2016). Responses of endogenous proline in rice seedlings under chromium exposure. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 2(4), 319-326. doi: 10.22034/gjesm.2016.02.04.001en_US
dc.identifier.issn2383-3572
dc.identifier.issn2383-3866
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2016.02.04.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.gjesm.net/article_20999.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/92021
dc.description.abstractHydroponic experiments were performed to exam the dynamic change of endogenous proline in rice seedlings exposed to potassium chromate chromium (VI) or chromium nitrate chromium (III). Although accumulation of both chromium species in rice seedlings was obvious, more chromium was detected in plant tissues of rice seedlings exposed to chromium (III) than those in chromium (VI), majority being in roots rather than shoots. Results also showed that the accumulation capacity of chromium by rice seedlings was positively correlated to chromium concentrations supplied in both chromium variants and the accumulation curve depicted an exponential trend in both chromium treatments over the entire period of exposure. Proline assays showed that both chromium variants induced the change of endogenous proline in shoots and roots of rice seedlings. Chromium (VI) of 12.8 mg/L increased proline content significantly (<em>p</em><0.05) compared to control, while the effect of chromium (III) on proline content was more evident at 30.0 mg/L (<em>p</em><0.05). The results collected here suggest that both chromium variants are able to cause the change of endogenous proline in rice seedlings, but the response was found to be different between the two chromium treatments.en_US
dc.format.extent869
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherGJESM Publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Journal of Environmental Science and Managementen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2016.02.04.001
dc.subjectAccumulationen_US
dc.subjectChromiumen_US
dc.subjectProlineen_US
dc.subjectRiceen_US
dc.subjectTranslocationen_US
dc.subjectSoil pollution and remediationen_US
dc.titleResponses of endogenous proline in rice seedlings under chromium exposureen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPERen_US
dc.contributor.departmentThe Guangxi Key Laboratory of Theory and Technology for Environmental Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science & Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, P.R. Chinaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentThe Guangxi Key Laboratory of Theory and Technology for Environmental Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science & Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, P.R. Chinaen_US
dc.citation.volume2
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.spage319
dc.citation.epage326


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد