نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorAfshar Moghaddam, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNasr, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-30T20:53:24Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-21T20:53:24Z
dc.date.available1399-07-30T20:53:24Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-10-21T20:53:24Z
dc.date.issued2006-03-01en_US
dc.date.issued1384-12-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2015-06-09en_US
dc.date.submitted1394-03-19fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationAfshar Moghaddam, N., Nasr, M.. (2006). Evaluation of Neuroendocrine and Proliferative Markers in Prostatic Adenocarcinomas. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 31(1), 18-21.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0253-0716
dc.identifier.issn1735-3688
dc.identifier.urihttps://ijms.sums.ac.ir/article_39981.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/439034
dc.description.abstractBackground: Certain marker studies have practical importance in the biology of prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the quantification of certain neuroendocrine and proliferative markers obtained during transurethral resection or prostatectomy, would help in the prognostic evaluation of prostatic adenocarcinomas. Methods: The present study was performed on samples obtained from two groups of patients with acinar type prostatic adenocarcinoma. Each group comprised 21 patients with Gleason scores ≥7 (high-grade) and Gleason scores ≤6 (low-grade). Tumors with their surrounding benign tissues were stained with Ki67 and chromogranin A (ChA), and their cell proliferation and neuroendocrine differentiation were examined. Results: The mean number of neuroendocrine cells (ChA positive cells) in high grade tumors was 21% and that of low grade was less than one percent (P<0.001). Whereas, the mean proliferative index determined by Ki67 positive cells was 49% in high grade tumors as compared to less than 4% in low grade tumors (P<0.001). No significant difference was found between the mean percentages of chA cells in the non-tumoral tissues of high grade (2.7%) and low grade (1.9%). The mean proliferative index in the non-tumoral tissues of high grade (2.8%) was significantly higher (P<0.001) than of low grade tumors (1.4%). Conclusion: The usage of proliferative index seems to be an acceptable diagnostic index for the determination of tumor grading.Iran J Med Sci 2006; 31(1): 18-21. Keywords ● Prostate cancer ● proliferative index ● chromogranin A ● Ki67en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShiraz University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIranian Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Neuroendocrine and Proliferative Markers in Prostatic Adenocarcinomasen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeOriginal Article(s)en_US
dc.citation.volume31
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage18
dc.citation.epage21


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد