نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorDrayabeigi Zand, Alien_US
dc.contributor.authorVaezi Heir, Azaren_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T12:44:16Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T12:44:16Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T12:44:16Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T12:44:16Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-01en_US
dc.date.issued1398-01-12fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2020-04-10en_US
dc.date.submitted1399-01-22fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationDrayabeigi Zand, Ali, Vaezi Heir, Azar. (2019). Environmental Impact Assessment of Solid Waste Disposal Options in Touristic Islands. Advances in Environmental Technology, 5(2), 115-125. doi: 10.22104/aet.2020.4143.1205en_US
dc.identifier.issn2476-6674
dc.identifier.issn2476-4779
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22104/aet.2020.4143.1205
dc.identifier.urihttp://aet.irost.ir/article_919.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/427345
dc.description.abstractKish Island is a popular tourist destination in Iran, and tourism plays an important role in its economy. The volume of waste produced in the island has increased given the construction of numerous industrial projects over the past decade, as well as an increase in the tourist population. This expansion signals a need to create new methods of waste disposal. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process that can be used to evaluate the impact of waste disposal options on Kish Island. Rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) is a powerful tool to carry out the environmental impact assessment. The RIAM conducted in this research incorporated the mathematical sustainability model to evaluate the impacts of four municipal solid waste disposal options on the environment on Kish Island. The options included: (Option 1) Continuing the current disposal activities in Kish Island, i.e., 50% waste recycling and 50% waste landfilling; (Option 2) 30% composting, 50% waste recycling, and 20% waste landfilling; (Option 3) 30% composting, 50% waste recycling, and 20% waste incineration; and (Option 4) 50% waste recycling and 50% waste incineration. Among these options, option 4 was the priority for the establishment of final waste disposal with the highest score (0.043) in terms of sustainability, as well as having fewer adverse environmental impacts. However, the current environmental status of the Kish Island disposal site (Option 1) had the lowest score (-0.263) in terms of sustainability and was found to be the last priority with the most destructive environmental effects.en_US
dc.format.extent1301
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherIranian Research Organization for Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Environmental Technologyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22104/aet.2020.4143.1205
dc.subjectDisposalen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectSolid wasteen_US
dc.subjectTouristic islanden_US
dc.subjectsolid and hazardous wastesen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental Impact Assessment of Solid Waste Disposal Options in Touristic Islandsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iranen_US
dc.citation.volume5
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage115
dc.citation.epage125
nlai.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2490-0893
nlai.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8541-8515


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد