نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorSeyedian, Seyed Mortezaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFarasati, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBahmani, O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSajad, J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T09:06:32Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T09:06:32Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T09:06:32Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T09:06:32Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-01en_US
dc.date.issued1394-09-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2014-12-06en_US
dc.date.submitted1393-09-15fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationSeyedian, Seyed Morteza, Farasati, M., Bahmani, O., Sajad, J.. (2015). Evaluation of Combination Methods for Garlic Evapotranspiration Estimation. Iran Agricultural Research, 34(2), 91-100. doi: 10.22099/iar.2016.3507en_US
dc.identifier.issn1013-9885
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/iar.2016.3507
dc.identifier.urihttp://iar.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3507.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/354992
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT-Different evapotranspiration (ET) estimation equations having different accuracy with different conditions have been developed for ET estimation. This study will firstly focus on the estimation of 13 climatic equations of daily garlic ET estimation whose  ET is measured by lysimeter to provide information which can be helpful in selecting an appropriate ET equation. The paper aims at showing the potential for combining the result of the best equation to improve the overall accuracy.  The findings  showed that the five equations of FAO 56 Penman–Monteith, ASCE Penman–Monteith, Kimberly Penman, Penman, and FAO-24 Blaney-Criddle were the most accurateequations for estimating garlic ET. The results of these five equations were combined using the three combination methods of Simple Average Method (C-SAM), multiple linear regression (C-MLR) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Interface System (C-ANFIS).The comparison of combination methods at the test stage showed that although C-SAM used simpler equations than C-MLR but its results were more reasonable than C-MLR. Overall, the results of these two combination methods did not significantly surpass those of the best ET estimation equations (FAO 56 PM); however,C-ANFIS combination method estimated ET better than the other techniques. Based on the results of this study, the C-ANFIS combination method is recommended for estimating garlic ET.en_US
dc.format.extent1024
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShiraz Universityen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه شیرازfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofIran Agricultural Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofتحقیقات کشاورزی ایرانfa_IR
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/iar.2016.3507
dc.subjectKeywords:en_US
dc.subjectCombination Method Evapotranspirationen_US
dc.subjectGarlicen_US
dc.subjectLysimeteren_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Combination Methods for Garlic Evapotranspiration Estimationen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeFull Articleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Agriculture, University of Gonbad-Kavous, Gonbad-Kavous, I. R. Iran.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Water Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, I. R. Iran.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Water Engineering, BualiSina University, Hamedan, I. R. Iran.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Agriculture, University of Gonbad-Kavous, Gonbad-Kavous, I. R. Iran.en_US
dc.citation.volume34
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage91
dc.citation.epage100


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد