نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T06:52:03Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T06:52:03Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T06:52:03Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T06:52:03Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-01en_US
dc.date.issued1393-09-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2015-07-20en_US
dc.date.submitted1394-04-29fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(2014). The Authoritative Governance in the Middle East And the Process of “Transition to Democracy”. International Journal of Political Science, 4(2), 13-28.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2228-6217
dc.identifier.issn14669-5346
dc.identifier.urihttp://ijps.azad.ac.ir/article_532752.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/310934
dc.description.abstractDuring<br />past two decades, “Pass through a democratic status" gave attention by most<br />Middle East analysts. In fact, since the early 1980s, The Middle East and The<br />North of Africa affected by third wave of democratization effects and both<br />state and society felt its impacts. Since, civil society has been promoting and<br />strengthening, from one hand, and sovereign governments gradually withdrawal<br />has begun, from the other. In a number of countries, this civil society<br />strength with weakness and withdrawal of sovereign governments was so that made<br />some analysts optimists to the coming Middle East. However, during the time, it<br />was revealed that the democracy in the states' viewpoints was different from<br />the Middle Eastern citizens' democratic calls. Put it differently, the<br />sovereign political elites sought for a democracy in which there was no changes<br />in power relationships, and participation declined to a quantitative presence<br />in elections - with predictable results - as well. This led the writers and<br />analysts to adopt more real and precise positions to obstacles of democratic<br />transition. To better understanding, one should aware that, like any other<br />social changes, this democratic transient, in each nation and country, requires<br />proper subjective and /or objective conditions to achieve. Proper subjective<br />grounds mean penetration of democratic thoughts and notions among peoples.<br />Besides, Proper socio-economic conditions are very important and necessary;<br />the   increased and promoted middle-class<br />and its independence of state is the most important indications of these<br />objective situations. Of course, these two positions is hard to reach, and it<br />doesn't mean that this democratic transition will be occurred so fast and<br />simple, since, as evidently, the historical  <br />and cultural background might appear a rigid and hard obstacle - or on<br />the contrary - shortens this process.en_US
dc.format.extent595
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherIslamic Azad University South Tehran Branchen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب IAU-Humanism and Social Sciencesfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Political Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Political Sciencefa_IR
dc.subjectDemocratizationen_US
dc.subjectAuthoritarianismen_US
dc.subjectpolitical participationen_US
dc.subjectCivil Societyen_US
dc.subjectIslamismen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Easten_US
dc.titleThe Authoritative Governance in the Middle East And the Process of “Transition to Democracy”en_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeOriginal Articleen_US
dc.citation.volume4
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage13
dc.citation.epage28


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد