نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorSafaei Naraghi, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorHallaji, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorDanesh Pajooh, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorMoslehi, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorJazayeri, Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T06:22:24Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T06:22:24Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T06:22:24Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T06:22:24Z
dc.date.issued2000-10-01en_US
dc.date.issued1379-07-10fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationSafaei Naraghi, Z, Hallaji, Z, Danesh Pajooh, M, Moslehi, H, Jazayeri, K. (2000). Evaluation of direct immunofluorescense on salt split skin in the differentiation of subepidermal autoimmune Bullous dermatoses. Iranian Journal of Dermatology, 4(1), 12-18.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2717-0721
dc.identifier.urihttp://iranjd.ir/article_98411.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/300995
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the prototype of subepidermal autoimmune bullous dermatoses (SABDs). Direct immunofluorescence on salt split skin substrate (DIF-SS) is one of the methods used to differentiate this group of dermatoses. Objective: We conducted this study in order to delineate the results of DIF-SS in SABD patients. Patients and Methods: Seventeen patients with a BP-like clinical picture referred to Razi Hospital in 1378, who had linear immunodeposits along basement membrane zone in direct immunofluorescence, were studied. Considering only histopathologic and clinical data, a final diagnosis was established for each patient. DIF-SS was performed on perilesional skin sample of patients. DIF-SS and histopathology results and the final diagnosis were recorded and compared for each patient. Results: In DIF-SS, eleven patients (65%) had combined (Epidermal and dermal), two patients (12%) had epidermal and four patients (23%) had dermal pattern. The final diagnoses were BP in ten patients and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) in two others. We were unable to differentiate BP from EBA in two patients. In ten patients who were diagnosed finally as BP, nine patients (90%) had combined pattern and only one case (10%) showed epidermal staining in DIF-SS. Conclusion: Surprisingly, in contrast to the results of the previous studies on pemphigoid patients using either IIF-SS or DIF-SS in which the epidermal pattern had been reported to be much more common than the combined pattern, the combined pattern was nine times more frequent than the epidermal pattern in this study. Perhaps, the difference in target antigens in our patients may be the underlying reason for the difference in our results.en_US
dc.format.extent1131
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherIranian Society of Dermatologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIranian Journal of Dermatologyen_US
dc.subjectbullous pemphigoiden_US
dc.subjectSalt split skinen_US
dc.subjectDirect immunofluorescenseen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of direct immunofluorescense on salt split skin in the differentiation of subepidermal autoimmune Bullous dermatosesen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.citation.volume4
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage12
dc.citation.epage18


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد