نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorHosseinpour, Aminen_US
dc.contributor.authorTurki, Habibollahen_US
dc.contributor.authorSoltani, Aboozaren_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T03:49:41Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T03:49:41Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T03:49:41Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T03:49:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-01en_US
dc.date.issued1397-12-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2019-02-11en_US
dc.date.submitted1397-11-22fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationHosseinpour, Amin, Turki, Habibollah, Soltani, Aboozar. (2019). Laboratory and semi-field evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bioflash®) against Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) in an endemic malarious area of Iran. Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, 26(2), 145-151. doi: 10.22062/jkmu.2019.89205en_US
dc.identifier.issn1023-9510
dc.identifier.issn2008-2843
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22062/jkmu.2019.89205
dc.identifier.urihttp://jkmu.kmu.ac.ir/article_89205.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/248838
dc.description.abstract<strong>Background:</strong> <em>Anopheles stephensi</em> is considered to be the main malaria vector in the Middle East area including Iran. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of a granule 10% formulation of <em>Bacillus thuringiensis </em>against this species under laboratory and semi-field conditions in an endemic malarious area of Iran. <strong>Method:</strong> After collecting mosquitos from Hurmudar, in order to find the best effective dose, five dosages (a quarter-dose, half dose, recommended dose, a twice-dose and four times dose) were used for laboratory and semi-field assays in Bandar Abbas. <strong>Results:</strong> Recommended dose by factory (0.017 g /0.1 m2) showed the highest mortality rate on <em>An. stephensi </em>larvae in both assays. The efficiency of Bt was very low (21 %) under semi-field condition. According to the results of this study, the use of bacteria alone cannot be a useful and effective way to control the vector of malaria in Iran's geographic conditions. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> This method can be used (in the case of appropriate efficacy of the tested formulation in field condition) as one of the constituent parts of Integrated Vector Management (IVM) program along with other recommended methods.en_US
dc.format.extent2008
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKerman University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Kerman University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22062/jkmu.2019.89205
dc.subjectBacillus thuringiensisen_US
dc.subjectAnopheles stephensien_US
dc.subjectLarvicideen_US
dc.subjectBiopesticideen_US
dc.subjectMalariaen_US
dc.subjectSemi-field assayen_US
dc.subjectIranen_US
dc.titleLaboratory and semi-field evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bioflash®) against Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) in an endemic malarious area of Iranen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentMaster of Science in Medical Entomology, Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAssociate Professor, Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAssociate Professor, Research Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iranen_US
dc.citation.volume26
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage145
dc.citation.epage151


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد