نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorEskandarizadeh, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhalilzadeh moghadam, Nen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T03:49:02Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T03:49:02Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T03:49:02Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T03:49:02Z
dc.date.issued2001-12-01en_US
dc.date.issued1380-09-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2016-10-09en_US
dc.date.submitted1395-07-18fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationEskandarizadeh, A, Khalilzadeh moghadam, N. (2001). Investiagtion of microleakage in CL II composit resin restorations with two-type of Amalgams in open sandwich technique. Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, 7(1), 17-26.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1023-9510
dc.identifier.issn2008-2843
dc.identifier.urihttp://jkmu.kmu.ac.ir/article_34075.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/248616
dc.description.abstractthe aim of this study was to determine the microleakage at the cervical margin of the class II composite resin syntac with and without a cervical amalgam base and to compare microleakage restoration at the occlusal margins of restorations and inferface of amalgam and composite.68 extracted sound permanent premolar were used.68 class II slot cavities were prepared in these teth.the teeth were randomly divided into four groups,and restored as follows :group A: Amalgam(cinalux)+syntac(bonding agent)+ composit(Tetric)( sandwich technique),groupB :Amalgam(luxalloy)+syntac+composite(tetric)(sandwich technique),group C:yntac +composite (control 1).group D:Amalgam(cinalux)(control2).then the teeth were thermocycled,and immersed in the fuchsion.marginal leakage was assessed by the degree of dye penetration on sections of the restored teeth,under stereo microscope at 7.5 maginification.for analysis of data non parametric statistic tests (Kruskal-wallis and mann withney-u)were used.although marginal leakage was not completely eliminated,sandwich technique exhibited significantly less leakage at the cervical margins than conventional method (syntac/tetric composite) and also there was no significant difference between cinallux and luxalloy amalgams,at the cervical and occlusal margins.en_US
dc.format.extent1841
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKerman University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Kerman University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectMicroleakageen_US
dc.subjectAmalgam baseen_US
dc.subjectlight cured compositeen_US
dc.subjectsandwich techniqueen_US
dc.titleInvestiagtion of microleakage in CL II composit resin restorations with two-type of Amalgams in open sandwich techniqueen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeOriginal Articleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAssistant professoren_US
dc.citation.volume7
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage17
dc.citation.epage26


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد