نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorMalmir, Alien_US
dc.contributor.authorYousof, Qutibaaen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T00:44:42Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T00:44:42Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T00:44:42Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T00:44:42Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-01en_US
dc.date.issued1397-12-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2019-08-21en_US
dc.date.submitted1398-05-30fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationMalmir, Ali, Yousof, Qutibaa. (2019). The Integration of Explicit Instruction and Implicit Meaning-Focused Experience for L2 Vocabulary Development: The Comparative Effect of Time Sequence. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 37(4), 71-108. doi: 10.22099/jtls.2019.34651.2730en_US
dc.identifier.issn2008-8191
dc.identifier.issn2717-1604
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2019.34651.2730
dc.identifier.urihttp://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_5426.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/184525
dc.description.abstractThe combination of implicit meaning-focused input and explicit instruction has been suggested by recent research as very effective for learning L2 vocabulary; however, the time sequence for such juxtaposition has not been adequately examined through empirical studies. Therefore, this study sought to find the optimal time for combining explicit and implicit L2 vocabulary instruction using an explanatory mixed-method design. A convenience sample of 62 upper-intermediate EFL learners from three intact classes participated in this study. The Test of Academic Word List (Version A) that assesses Coxhead's (2000) Academic Word List (AWL) was administered as a pertest. The reading book, Focus on Vocabulary 2, that has been developed based on the AWL was used for giving meaning-forced input. The target words were explicitly pre-taught in Class A (n=22), taught concurrent with encountering them in the reading text in Class B (n=20), and post-taught in Class C (n=22). Version B of the AWL Test was used as the posttest and after a 14-day retention interval (RI) as the delayed posttest. Then, 25% of the learners were orally interviewed about their attitudes toward the treatment they received. Quantitative data analysis using one-way ANCOVA revealed that explicit teaching during the reading was the optimal time and could help learners significantly do better on the immediate and delayed post-tests followed by pre-teaching. Qualitative analysis also verified the obtained quantitative results. The findings of this study imply that explicit vocabulary teaching during the reading should be practiced by EFL teachers/learners for fostering vocabulary development.en_US
dc.format.extent457
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShiraz Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Teaching Language Skillsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2019.34651.2730
dc.subjectExplicit teachingen_US
dc.subjectImplicit teachingen_US
dc.subjectVocabulary developmenten_US
dc.subjectVocabulary retentionen_US
dc.subjectMeaning-focused experienceen_US
dc.titleThe Integration of Explicit Instruction and Implicit Meaning-Focused Experience for L2 Vocabulary Development: The Comparative Effect of Time Sequenceen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAssistant Professor at Imam Khomeini International Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMA Student of Applied Linguistics, Imam Khomeini International University (IKIU), Qazvin, Iranen_US
dc.citation.volume37
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.spage71
dc.citation.epage108
nlai.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1589-0301


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد