نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorشهين مجيريen_US
dc.contributor.authorفريبا رخشen_US
dc.contributor.authorنجمه نه‌روزيانen_US
dc.contributor.authorمنصوره اردستانيen_US
dc.contributor.authorمحمد موسويen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-12-02T04:38:20Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-20T04:38:30Z
dc.date.available1399-12-02T04:38:20Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2021-02-20T04:38:30Z
dc.date.issued2013-02-02en_US
dc.date.issued1391-11-14fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2013-02-02en_US
dc.date.submitted1391-11-14fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(1391). مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت, 0(0), 862-869.fa_IR
dc.identifier.issn1735-7853
dc.identifier.issn1735-9813
dc.identifier.urihttp://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/1147
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/749287
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Nowadays , use of library software is a basic need for libraries and information centers. User interface is a part of computerized systems which is interacting to the user and it is an important factor in information searching process. This study aimed to compare librarian's satisfaction rate from library software interface in Isfahan libraries in 2010. Methods: This was a descriptive-analytical study which was performed on Isfahan's librarians (n = 650), and the sample size (n = 242) was determined according to the Morgan’s and Krejcie’s sample size table. Five library software were compared together including: Pars-Azarakhsh, Payam, Nosa, Kavosh, and Namayeh. Sampling was conducted through stratified quota method. Data were collected using questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (QUIS) in 5-point Likert scale. Results: In terms of general features (mean = 4), information display (mean = 3.79), terminology and system feedback (mean = 3.07), help (mean = 3.64) and system capabilities and properties (mean = 3.76), Nosa software was the first ranking software and Pars-Azarakhsh and Kavosh were the second and third, respectively. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, Nosa was the best software and Pars Azarakhsh and Kavosh were ranked the second and third, respectively. Since librarians spend most of their working hours with several library software, their job satisfaction from the software interface has a large impact on the success of software companies, thus supporting and training department of such companies must have regular meetings and forums to examine the factors influencing on librarians’ satisfaction from library software and also apply librarians’ comments in their designs. Keywords: Software; User Computer Interface; Satisfaction; Librarians; Librariesen_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهانfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofمدیریت اطلاعات سلامتfa_IR
dc.titleمیزان رضایت کتابداران از محیط رابط نرم‌افزار‌های کتابخانه‌ای شهر اصفهانen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentکارشناس ارشد، کتابداري و اطلاع‌رساني، مرکز تحقيقات فناوري اطلاعات در علوم سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايرانen_US
dc.contributor.departmentکارشناس ارشد، کتابداري و اطلاع‌رساني پزشکي، مرکز تحقيقات فناوري اطلاعات در علوم سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايرانen_US
dc.contributor.departmentکارشناس، کتابداري و اطلاع‌رساني پزشکي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايرانen_US
dc.contributor.departmentکارشناس، کتابداري و اطلاع‌رساني پزشکي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايرانen_US
dc.contributor.departmentکارشناس ارشد، آمار و اپيدميولوژي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايرانen_US
dc.citation.volume0
dc.citation.issue0
dc.citation.spage862
dc.citation.epage869


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد