نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorمحمد حسين يارمحمديانen_US
dc.contributor.authorراحله سموعيen_US
dc.contributor.authorرحيم خداياري زرنقen_US
dc.contributor.authorعلي ايوبيانen_US
dc.contributor.authorحسين باقريان محمود آباديen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-12-02T04:37:19Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-20T04:37:29Z
dc.date.available1399-12-02T04:37:19Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2021-02-20T04:37:29Z
dc.date.issued2012-03-08en_US
dc.date.issued1390-12-18fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2012-03-08en_US
dc.date.submitted1390-12-18fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(1390). مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت, 0(0)fa_IR
dc.identifier.issn1735-7853
dc.identifier.issn1735-9813
dc.identifier.urihttp://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/535
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/749283
dc.description.abstractBackground: Agility means ability to respond and react quickly and successfully to environmental changes. Agility is an important factor for hospital effectiveness. Agility in a hospital indicates the hospital's responsiveness when faced with internal and external changes. If hospitals are designed to be agile, they should have the ability to compete with other hospitals and provide appropriate services to their patients. This study compared agility in public and private hospitals in Isfahan, Iran in 2009. Methods: This descriptive, analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted in 2009. The study population included the executives of administrative and financial sectors, health sector, and paraclinics, as well as supervisors in Khorshid, Chamran, Khanevadeh and Sina Hospitals. A total number of 130 individuals (calculated according to Cochran formula) were selected from the four mentioned hospitals. Data collection tool was the 42-item Likert-scale questionnaire of agility. The maximum and minimum scores of the questionnaire were 168 and zero, respectively. The  questionnaire was valid and reliable based on the experts in the field and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.96, respectively. Data was analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistical methods in SPSS 16 . Results: Mean agility scores public and private hospitals were 103.7 and 113.9, respectively. Although a significant difference was observed between mean agility scores of selected hospitals in Isfahan (P < 0.0001), public and private hospitals were not significantly different in terms of agility (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Agility in both public and private hospitals was higher than moderate. In order to improve agility in hospitals, using strategies and solutions such as flexible organizational structure, outsourcing of supplies and services, professional development of staff and preparation to face the environmental changes are required. Keywords: Organizational Agility; Evolution Management; Health Services Management; Hospitals.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهانfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofمدیریت اطلاعات سلامتfa_IR
dc.titleوضعیت چابکی بیمارستان‌های شهر اصفهانen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentدانشيار، مديريت و برنامه ريزي آموزشي، مرکز تحقيقات مديريت و اقتصاد سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايران.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentکارشناس ارشد، روانشناسي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايران.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentدانشجوي دکتراي تخصصي، سياستگذاري سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي تهران، تهران، ايرانen_US
dc.contributor.departmentکارشناسي ارشد، مديريت خدمات بهداشتي درماني، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايرانen_US
dc.contributor.departmentمربي، مدارک پزشکي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايرانen_US
dc.citation.volume0
dc.citation.issue0


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد