نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorفاطمه روزبهانيen_US
dc.contributor.authorعباس شيخ طاهريen_US
dc.contributor.authorمهرداد فرزندي‌پورen_US
dc.contributor.authorفاطمه رنگرزجديen_US
dc.contributor.authorزهره مبارك قمصريen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-12-02T04:22:05Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-20T04:22:15Z
dc.date.available1399-12-02T04:22:05Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2021-02-20T04:22:15Z
dc.date.issued2011-06-10en_US
dc.date.issued1390-03-20fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2011-06-10en_US
dc.date.submitted1390-03-20fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(1390). مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت, 8(2)fa_IR
dc.identifier.issn1735-7853
dc.identifier.issn1735-9813
dc.identifier.urihttp://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/259
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/749223
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The goal of Training activities is to grow potential abilities and intelligence in human. Evaluation of Training Service has main role in achieving qualified educational activities and increasing students’ skills. Therefore, this study evaluated the performance of training educators from points of view of medical record students in Kashan University of Medical Sciences in 2005-6. Methods: In this descriptive study, medical record students from all levels of associate and bachelor degree including 21 associate and 20 undergraduate students of bachelor degree in the second semester of 2005-2006, were enrolled. A questionnaire consisting of ten questions with very good to weak responses, with confirmed validity and reliability, was used. Totally 328 questionnaires were distributed to evaluate all training instructors (8 cases), from which 205 questionnaires were returned. Results: Most of the students (71.2%) considered the controlling of students’ absent and present as very good score. Respecting to Islamic and moral rules (69.7%), coming on time (67.8%), answering to students’ questions (60.5%), dominating to practical skills (60%), expressing theorical explanations for practical skills (57.1%), explain trainer's tasks (57.1%), being careful in doing trainers’ tasks (55.6%), following trainers’ problems (52.7%), supervising on learning (51.2%), were in next stages. Conclusion: Totally, students evaluated training educators’ performance in very good level. It seems that attention to the factors like following trainers’ problems, being careful in doing trainers’ tasks and supervising on his/her learning can improve learning quality more and more. Keywords: Medical Records; Training; Trainee; Evaluation.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهانfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofمدیریت اطلاعات سلامتfa_IR
dc.titleارزیابی عملكرد مربیان كارآموزی از نظر دانشجویان مدارك پزشكی درen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentمربي، مدارک پزشکي، دانشگاه علوم پزشكي كاشان، کاشان، ايران.en_US
dc.contributor.department. دانشجوي دکتري، مديريت اطلاعات بهداشتي درماني، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي تهران، تهران، ايران.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentاستاديار، مديريت اطلاعات بهداشتي درماني، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي کاشان، کاشان، ايران.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentمربي، مدارک پزشکي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي کاشان، کاشان، ايران.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentکارشناس، مدارک پزشکي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي کاشان، کاشان، ايرانen_US
dc.citation.volume8
dc.citation.issue2


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد