نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorسکينه سقاييان‌نژاد اصفهانيen_US
dc.contributor.authorسعيد سعيد‌بخشen_US
dc.contributor.authorمريم جهانبخشen_US
dc.contributor.authorمحبوبه حبيبيen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-12-02T04:02:02Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-20T04:02:12Z
dc.date.available1399-12-02T04:02:02Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2021-02-20T04:02:12Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-07en_US
dc.date.issued1390-09-16fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2011-12-07en_US
dc.date.submitted1390-09-16fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(1390). مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت, 8(5)fa_IR
dc.identifier.issn1735-7853
dc.identifier.issn1735-9813
dc.identifier.urihttp://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/415
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/749144
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Hospital Information Systems (HISs) have positive effects on patients' treatment process and organizational function. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the quality of services provided by such systems. The aim of this study was to assess and compare HISs in Isfahan hospitals based on the DeLone and McLean Model adjusted. Methods: This was an applied, analytical-descriptive study performed in public and private hospitals of Isfahan in 2010. Research population consisted of system users and designers and authorities of hospital information technology, directors and managers of official and clinical departments equipped by such systems. While users were selected by random sampling (n = 300), census method was used for the other two groups (n = 212). Data was collected using a questionnaire designed by the researcher based on three criteria (system quality, information quality and user satisfaction). It was adjusted to DeLone and McLean model. Content validity of the questionnaire was verified by faculty members as well as computer science specialists. The reliability of the questionnaire was estimated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient and data was analyzed by SPPS. Results: According to our findings, mean scores of system quality, information quality and satisfaction were significantly different between various kinds of HISs, as well as between different hospitals (P < 0.05). Total mean scores of system quality, information quality and satisfaction for all HISs were 58.6, 60.8 and 61.2, respectively. Conclusion: According to the results of this research, the criteria of HISs have been implemented in a rather optimum condition. Thus in order to reach desirable conditions, it is necessary to pay particular attention to factors improving system quality, information quality, type of specialty in a hospital, and users' expectations and specialty when designing HISs. Keywords: Technology Assessment; Hospitals; Software; Hospital Information System; DeLone and McLean Model.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهانfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofمدیریت اطلاعات سلامتfa_IR
dc.titleارزیابی و مقایسه‌ی نرم‌افزارهای سیستم اطلاعات بیمارستانی در بیمارستان‌های شهر اصفهان بر اساس مدل تعدیل یافته‌یDelone and MCleanen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentمربي، آموزش مدارک پزشکي، مرکز تحقيقات مديريت و اقتصاد سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان و دانشجوي دکتري، مديريت برنامه‌ريزي آموزشي، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ايران.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentمربي، کامپيوتر نرم‌افزار، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايران.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentمربي، آموزش مدارک پزشکي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايرانen_US
dc.contributor.departmentدانشجوي کارشناسي ارشد، کميته‌ي تحقيقات دانشجويي، آموزش مدارک پزشکي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايرانen_US
dc.citation.volume8
dc.citation.issue5


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد