نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorMokhtari, maryamen_US
dc.date.accessioned1402-10-12T01:05:36Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-02T01:05:56Z
dc.date.available1402-10-12T01:05:36Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2024-01-02T01:05:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-01en_US
dc.date.issued1401-07-09fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(1401). نشریه زمین شناسی مهندسی, 16(1), 95-122.fa_IR
dc.identifier.issn2228-6837
dc.identifier.issn7386-8222
dc.identifier.urihttp://jeg.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3009-en.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/1055305
dc.description.abstractIn geotechnical engineering, rock mechanics and engineering geology, depending on the project design, uniaxial strength and static Youngchr('39')s modulus of rocks are of vital importance. The direct determination of the aforementioned parameters in the laboratory, however, requires intact and high-quality cores and preparation of their specimens have some limitations. Moreover, performing these tests is time-consuming and costly. Therefore, in this study, it was tried to precisely predict the desirable parameters using physical characteristics and ultrasonic tests. To do so, two methods, i.e. principal components regression and support vector regression, were employed. The parameters used in modelling included density, P- wave velocity, dynamic Poisson’s ratio and porosity. Accordingly, the experimental results conducted on 115 limestone rock samples, including uniaxial compressive and ultrasonic tests, were used and the desired parameters in the modelling were extracted using the laboratory results. By means of correlation coefficient (R2), normalized mean square error (NMSE) and Mean absolute error (MAE), the developed models were validated and their accuracy were evaluated. The obtained results showed that both methods could estimate the target parameters with high accuracy. In support vector regression, Particle Swarm Optimization method was used for determining optimal values of box constraint mode and epsilon mode, and the modelling was conducted using four kernel functions, including linear, quadratic, cubic and Gaussian. Here, the quadratic kernel function yielded the best result for UCS and cubic kernel function yielded the best result for Es. In addition, comparing the results of the principal components regression and the support vector regression indicated that the latter outperformed the former.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه خوارزمیfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofنشریه زمین شناسی مهندسیfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Engineering Geologyen_US
dc.subjectUniaxial compressive strengthen_US
dc.subjectStatic young’s moduleen_US
dc.subjectSupport vector regressionen_US
dc.subjectPrincipal components regressionen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonic testen_US
dc.subjectGeotecnicen_US
dc.titlePredicting the Young's Modulus and Uniaxial Compressive Strength of a typical limestone using the Principal Component Regression and Particle Swarm Optimizationen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Civil engineering, Faculty of engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iranen_US
dc.citation.volume16
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage95
dc.citation.epage122


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد