نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorBarasa, Edwineen_US
dc.contributor.authorMolyneux, Sassyen_US
dc.contributor.authorEnglish, Mikeen_US
dc.contributor.authorCleary, Susanen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-08T20:08:34Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T20:08:34Z
dc.date.available1399-07-08T20:08:34Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-29T20:08:34Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-01en_US
dc.date.issued1394-08-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2015-03-25en_US
dc.date.submitted1394-01-05fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationBarasa, Edwine, Molyneux, Sassy, English, Mike, Cleary, Susan. (2015). Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 4(11), 719-732. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.167en_US
dc.identifier.issn2322-5939
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.167
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ijhpm.com/article_3096.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/82045
dc.description.abstractBackground <br />Priority setting in healthcare is a key determinant of health system performance. However, there is no widely accepted priority setting evaluation framework. We reviewed literature with the aim of developing and proposing a framework for the evaluation of macro and meso level healthcare priority setting practices. <br />  <br />Methods <br />We systematically searched Econlit, PubMed, CINAHL, and EBSCOhost databases and supplemented this with searches in Google Scholar, relevant websites and reference lists of relevant papers. A total of 31 papers on evaluation of priority setting were identified. These were supplemented by broader theoretical literature related to evaluation of priority setting. A conceptual review of selected papers was undertaken. <br />  <br />Results <br />Based on a synthesis of the selected literature, we propose an evaluative framework that requires that priority setting practices at the macro and meso levels of the health system meet the following conditions: (1) Priority setting decisions should incorporate both efficiency and equity considerations as well as the following outcomes; (a) Stakeholder satisfaction, (b) Stakeholder understanding, (c) Shifted priorities (reallocation of resources), and (d) Implementation of decisions. (2) Priority setting processes should also meet the procedural conditions of (a) Stakeholder engagement, (b) Stakeholder empowerment, (c) Transparency, (d) Use of evidence, (e) Revisions, (f) Enforcement, and (g) Being grounded on community values. <br />  <br />Conclusion <br />Available frameworks for the evaluation of priority setting are mostly grounded on procedural requirements, while few have included outcome requirements. There is, however, increasing recognition of the need to incorporate both consequential and procedural considerations in priority setting practices. In this review, we adapt an integrative approach to develop and propose a framework for the evaluation of priority setting practices at the macro and meso levels that draws from these complementary schools of thought.en_US
dc.format.extent685
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKerman University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Health Policy and Managementen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.167
dc.subjectPriority Settingen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare Rationingen_US
dc.subjectResource Allocationen_US
dc.subjectPriority Setting Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectCommunitarianismen_US
dc.subjectHealth Equityen_US
dc.titleSetting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluationen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeReview Articleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research – Coast, and Welcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenyaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research – Coast, and Welcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenyaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research – Coast, and Welcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenyaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africaen_US
dc.citation.volume4
dc.citation.issue11
dc.citation.spage719
dc.citation.epage732
nlai.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5793-7177


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد