• ثبت نام
    • ورود به سامانه
    مشاهده مورد 
    •   صفحهٔ اصلی
    • نشریات انگلیسی
    • International Journal of Health Policy and Management
    • Volume 5, Issue 10
    • مشاهده مورد
    •   صفحهٔ اصلی
    • نشریات انگلیسی
    • International Journal of Health Policy and Management
    • Volume 5, Issue 10
    • مشاهده مورد
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    National Health Service Principles as Experienced by Vulnerable London Migrants in “Austerity Britain”: A Qualitative Study of Rights, Entitlements, and Civil-Society Advocacy

    (ندگان)پدیدآور
    Rafighi, ElhamPoduval, ShobaLegido-Quigley, HelenaHoward, Natasha
    Thumbnail
    دریافت مدرک مشاهده
    FullText
    اندازه فایل: 
    602.9کیلوبایت
    نوع فايل (MIME): 
    PDF
    نوع مدرک
    Text
    Original Article
    زبان مدرک
    English
    نمایش کامل رکورد
    چکیده
    Background Recent British National Health Service (NHS) reforms, in response to austerity and alleged ‘health tourism,' could impose additional barriers to healthcare access for non-European Economic Area (EEA) migrants. This study explores policy reform challenges and implications, using excerpts from the perspectives of non-EEA migrants and health advocates in London.   Methods A qualitative study design was selected. Data were collected through document review and 22 indepth interviews with non-EEA migrants and civil-society organisation representatives. Data were analysed thematically using the NHS principles.   Results The experiences of those ‘vulnerable migrants' (ie, defined as adult non-EEA asylum-seekers, refugees, undocumented, low-skilled, and trafficked migrants susceptible to marginalised healthcare access) able to access health services were positive, with healthcare professionals generally demonstrating caring attitudes. However, general confusion existed about entitlements due to recent NHS changes, controversy over ‘health tourism,' and challenges registering for health services or accessing secondary facilities. Factors requiring greater clarity or improvement included accessibility, communication, and clarity on general practitioner (GP) responsibilities and migrant entitlements.   Conclusion Legislation to restrict access to healthcare based on immigration status could further compromise the health of vulnerable individuals in Britain. This study highlights current challenges in health services policy and practice and the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in healthcare advocacy (eg, helping the voices of the most vulnerable reach policy-makers). Thus, it contributes to broadening national discussions and enabling more nuanced interpretation of ongoing global debates on immigration and health.
    کلید واژگان
    Migrant Health
    National Health Service (NHS)
    England
    London
    Austerity
    Health Equity

    شماره نشریه
    10
    تاریخ نشر
    2016-10-01
    1395-07-10
    ناشر
    Kerman University of Medical Sciences
    سازمان پدید آورنده
    Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
    Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
    Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
    Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

    شاپا
    2322-5939
    URI
    https://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.50
    https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3198.html
    https://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/81924

    مرور

    همه جای سامانهپایگاه‌ها و مجموعه‌ها بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌هااین مجموعه بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌ها

    حساب من

    ورود به سامانهثبت نام

    آمار

    مشاهده آمار استفاده

    تازه ترین ها

    تازه ترین مدارک
    © کليه حقوق اين سامانه برای سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی ایران محفوظ است
    تماس با ما | ارسال بازخورد
    قدرت یافته توسطسیناوب