نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorJafari, Zahraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMotamedi, Marjanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJalalizand, Nilufaren_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T11:38:16Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T11:38:16Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T11:38:16Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T11:38:16Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-01en_US
dc.date.issued1396-06-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2019-07-09en_US
dc.date.submitted1398-04-18fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationJafari, Zahra, Motamedi, Marjan, Jalalizand, Nilufar. (2017). A comparison between CHROMagar, PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP for identification of Candida species. Current Medical Mycology, 3(3), 10-15.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2423-3439
dc.identifier.issn2423-3420
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmm.mazums.ac.ir/article_90362.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/406074
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: The epidemiological alteration in the distribution of Candida species, as well as the significantly increasing trend of either intrinsic or acquired resistance of some of these fungi highlights the need for a reliable method for the identification of the species. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is one of the methods facilitating the quick and precise identification of Candida species. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of CHROMagar, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), and PCR-fragment size polymorphism (PCR-FSP) assays in the identification of Candida species to determine the benefits and limitations of these methods. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 107 Candida strains, including 20 standard strains and 87 clinical isolates. The identification of the isolates was accomplished by using CHROMagar as a conventional method. The PCR-RFLP assay was performed on the entire internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA (rDNA), and the consequent enzymatic digestion was compared with PCR-FSP results in which ITS1 and ITS2 regions were separately PCR amplified. In both molecular assays, yeast identification was carried out through the specific electrophoretic profiles of the PCR products. Results: According to the results, the utilization of CHROMagar resulted in the identi-fication of 29 (33.3%) Candida isolates, while the PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP facilitated the identification of 83 (95.4%) and 80 (91.9%) isolates, respectively. The obtained concordances between CHROMagar and PCR-RFLP, between CHROMagar and PCR-FSP, as well as between PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP were 0.20, 0.23, and 0.77, respectively. Conclusion: The recognition of the benefits and limitations of PCR methods allows for the selection of the most efficient technique for a fast and correct differentiation. The PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP assays had satisfactory concordance. The PCR-FSP provides a rapid, technically simple, and cost-effective method for the identification of Candida species. Nevertheless, to accurately differentiate among the taxonomically related species, PCR-RFLP should be implemented.en_US
dc.format.extent440
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMazandaran University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Medical Mycologyen_US
dc.subjectCandida speciesen_US
dc.subjectIdentificationen_US
dc.subjectPCR-fragment size polymorphismen_US
dc.subjectPCR-restriction fragment length polymorphismen_US
dc.titleA comparison between CHROMagar, PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP for identification of Candida speciesen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, National Institute of Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iranen_US
dc.citation.volume3
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.spage10
dc.citation.epage15
nlai.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1066-8752


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد