نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.date.accessioned1399-07-08T18:04:53Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T18:04:54Z
dc.date.available1399-07-08T18:04:53Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-29T18:04:54Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-01en_US
dc.date.issued1393-04-10fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(2014). Influence of Mammographic Screening on Breast Cancer Incidence Trends in South Australia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 15(7), 3105-3112.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1513-7368
dc.identifier.issn2476-762X
dc.identifier.urihttp://journal.waocp.org/article_29049.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/35786
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To examine breast cancer (BC) incidence trends in relation to mammographic screening and riskfactor prevalence in South Australia (SA). Materials and <br/><b>Methods</b>:Trends in annual BC incidence rates werecalculated using direct standardisation and compared with projected incidence derived from Poisson regressionanalysis of pre-screening rates. Annual percentage change and change time points were estimated using Joinpointsoftware. Biennial mammography screening participation rates were calculated using data from BreastScreenSA. Trends in overweight/obesity, alcohol use and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use were examined using1991-2009 Health Omnibus Survey data. Trends in total fertility were examined using data from the AustralianBureau of Statistics. <br/><b>Results</b>: BC incidence increased around the time BreastScreen commenced and thenstabilised in the mid-1990s. However rates have remained higher than projected, even though the proportionand age distribution of first time screening attendees stabilised around 1998. A decrease in BC incidence wasobserved among women aged 50-59yrs from the late-1990’s but not among older women. Obesity and alcoholuse have increased steadily in all age groups, while HRT use declined sharply from the late-1990s. <br/><b>Conclusions</b>:BC incidence has remained higher than projected since mammography screening began. The sustained elevationis likely to be due to lead time effects, though over-diagnosis cannot be excluded. Declining HRT use has alsoimpacted incidence trends. Implications: Studies using individual level data, which can account for changes inrisk factor prevalence and lead time effects, are required to evaluate ‘over-diagnosis’ due to screening.en_US
dc.format.extent462
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWest Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention (WAOCP)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Preventionen_US
dc.subjectbreast canceren_US
dc.subjectincidence trendsen_US
dc.subjectmammographic screeningen_US
dc.titleInfluence of Mammographic Screening on Breast Cancer Incidence Trends in South Australiaen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.citation.volume15
dc.citation.issue7
dc.citation.spage3105
dc.citation.epage3112


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد