نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.date.accessioned1399-07-08T17:59:18Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T17:59:18Z
dc.date.available1399-07-08T17:59:18Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-29T17:59:18Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-01en_US
dc.date.issued1391-12-11fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(2013). The National Cancer Screening Program for Breast Cancerin the Republic of Korea: Is it Cost-Effective?. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14(3), 2059-2065.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1513-7368
dc.identifier.issn2476-762X
dc.identifier.urihttp://journal.waocp.org/article_27575.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/33700
dc.description.abstractThis goal of this research was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the National Cancer ScreeningProgram (NCSP) for breast cancer in the Republic of Korea from a government expenditure perspective. In2002-2003 (baseline), a total of 8,724,860 women aged 40 years or over were invited to attend breast cancerscreening by the NCSP. Those who attended were identified using the NCSP database, and women weredivided into two groups, women who attended screening at baseline (screened group) and those who did not(non-screened group). Breast cancer diagnosis in both groups at baseline, and during 5-year follow-up wasidentified using the Korean Central Cancer Registry. The effectiveness of the NCSP for breast cancer wasestimated by comparing 5-year survival and life years saved (LYS) between the screened and the unscreenedgroups, measured using mortality data from the Korean National Health Insurance Corporation and theNational Health Statistical Office. Direct screening costs, indirect screening costs, and productivity costs wereconsidered in different combinations in the model. When all three of these costs were considered together,the incremental cost to save one life year of a breast cancer patient was 42,305,000 Korean Won (KW)(1 USD=1,088 KW) for the screened group compared to the non-screened group. In sensitivity analyses,reducing the false-positive rate of the screening program by half was the most cost-effective (incrementalcost-effectiveness ratio, ICER=30,110,852 KW/LYS) strategy. When the upper age limit for screening wasset at 70 years, it became more cost-effective (ICER=39,641,823 KW/LYS) than when no upper age limitwas set. The NCSP for breast cancer in Korea seems to be accepted as cost-effective as ICER estimates werearound the Gross Domestic Product. However, cost-effectiveness could be further improved by increasingthe sensitivity of breast cancer screening and by setting appropriate age limits.en_US
dc.format.extent411
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWest Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention (WAOCP)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Preventionen_US
dc.subjectCost-effectiveness analysisen_US
dc.subjectEconomic Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectBreast Cancer Screeningen_US
dc.subjectmammographyen_US
dc.subjectKoreaen_US
dc.titleThe National Cancer Screening Program for Breast Cancerin the Republic of Korea: Is it Cost-Effective?en_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.citation.volume14
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.spage2059
dc.citation.epage2065


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد