نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorPirzadeh, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorToloei, A. R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T08:11:27Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T08:11:27Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T08:11:27Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T08:11:27Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-01en_US
dc.date.issued1398-01-12fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2018-10-06en_US
dc.date.submitted1397-07-14fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationPirzadeh, M., Toloei, A. R.. (2019). Design of Generalized Predictive Control for the Stabilizing Loop from a two-axis Gimbal Seeker, Considering Cross-Coupling in Between two Channels. International Journal of Engineering, 32(4), 555-561. doi: 10.5829/ije.2019.32.04a.13en_US
dc.identifier.issn1025-2495
dc.identifier.issn1735-9244
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5829/ije.2019.32.04a.13
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ije.ir/article_86154.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/336719
dc.description.abstractIn this research, Generalized Predictivecontrol (GPC) is proposed for the control of a stabilizing loop from a two axis gimbal seeker. In fact, there are some views about using GPC type controller which are two folds. First, it drives the stabilization loops that are made by a DC motor, Rate Gyro, inertia and cross coupling unit in between two channels using the predictive model type controller. Second, the theory is to excavate the results of flight simulation on the efficiency of two-axis gimbal seeker. The simulations, based on different scenarios, are valuated for the proficiency of the designed system considering the dynamic mass imbalance and the cross-coupling in between two channels and the flight simulation. The flight simulation results are explained the accuracy of the designed system with predictive control in opposite of conventional PI controller. For example, the simulation results in altitude of 2km show the suggested system in comparison with conventional PI controller improves miss-distance and flight time 11.98% and 1.5%  respectively. Moreover, the suggested system in maximum control signal is 72.61%, minimum control signal is 1.55% and final time is 80.43% (control effort parameter), which is better than PI type controller.en_US
dc.format.extent1060
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMaterials and Energy Research Centeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.5829/ije.2019.32.04a.13
dc.subjectGeneralized Predictive Controlen_US
dc.subjectgimbal seekeren_US
dc.subjectCross Couplingen_US
dc.subjectControl Efforten_US
dc.titleDesign of Generalized Predictive Control for the Stabilizing Loop from a two-axis Gimbal Seeker, Considering Cross-Coupling in Between two Channelsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeOriginal Articleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Aerospace, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iranen_US
dc.citation.volume32
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.spage555
dc.citation.epage561


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد