نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorBeiki, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorAmini, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorDowlatabadi, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorPirali, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T06:56:45Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T06:56:45Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T06:56:45Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T06:56:45Z
dc.date.issued2003-10-01en_US
dc.date.issued1382-07-09fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2010-11-20en_US
dc.date.submitted1389-08-29fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationBeiki, D, Amini, M, Dowlatabadi, R, Pirali, M. (2003). Comparative Bioavailability of Two Tablet Formulations of Dipyridamole in Healthy Volunteers. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2(4), 213-216. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2010.58en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-0328
dc.identifier.issn1726-6890
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2010.58
dc.identifier.urihttp://ijpr.sbmu.ac.ir/article_58.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/312514
dc.description.abstractThe bioavailability of two dipyridamol tablet formulations of (Dipyridamole from Tolidaru and Persantin from Boehringer) was compared in 14 healthy male volunteers who received a single dose of 25 mg of the test (T) and the reference (R) products in a randomized balanced 2-way crossover design. Plasma samples were obtained over a 16 h interval and dipyridamole concentrations determined by HPLC with ultraviolet detection. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration time curve up to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), as well as infinity (AUC0-¥), and the absorption rate (Cmax/AUC0-¥) were analyzed statistically under the assumption of a multiplicative model. The time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was analyzed assuming an additive model. The parametric confidence intervals (90%) of the mean values of the pharmacokinetic characteristics for T/R ratio were in each case well within the bioequivalence acceptable range of 80-125%. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation by the Schuirmann’s two one-sided t tests and by Wilcoxon Mann Whitney two one-sided tests procedure. Therefore, the 2 formulations were considered to be equivalent.en_US
dc.format.extent36
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSchool of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Researchen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2010.58
dc.subjectDipyridamoleen_US
dc.subjectComparative bioavailabilityen_US
dc.subjectPharmacokinetic parametersen_US
dc.subjectBioequivalenten_US
dc.titleComparative Bioavailability of Two Tablet Formulations of Dipyridamole in Healthy Volunteersen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.citation.volume2
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.spage213
dc.citation.epage216


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد