| dc.contributor.author | Beiki, D | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Amini, M | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Dowlatabadi, R | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Pirali, M | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 1399-07-09T06:56:45Z | fa_IR |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-30T06:56:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 1399-07-09T06:56:45Z | fa_IR |
| dc.date.available | 2020-09-30T06:56:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003-10-01 | en_US |
| dc.date.issued | 1382-07-09 | fa_IR |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-11-20 | en_US |
| dc.date.submitted | 1389-08-29 | fa_IR |
| dc.identifier.citation | Beiki, D, Amini, M, Dowlatabadi, R, Pirali, M. (2003). Comparative Bioavailability of Two Tablet Formulations of Dipyridamole in Healthy Volunteers. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2(4), 213-216. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2010.58 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1735-0328 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1726-6890 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2010.58 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ijpr.sbmu.ac.ir/article_58.html | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/312514 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The bioavailability of two dipyridamol tablet formulations of (Dipyridamole from Tolidaru and Persantin from Boehringer) was compared in 14 healthy male volunteers who received a single dose of 25 mg of the test (T) and the reference (R) products in a randomized balanced 2-way crossover design. Plasma samples were obtained over a 16 h interval and dipyridamole concentrations determined by HPLC with ultraviolet detection. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration time curve up to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), as well as infinity (AUC0-¥), and the absorption rate (Cmax/AUC0-¥) were analyzed statistically under the assumption of a multiplicative model. The time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was analyzed assuming an additive model. The parametric confidence intervals (90%) of the mean values of the pharmacokinetic characteristics for T/R ratio were in each case well within the bioequivalence acceptable range of 80-125%. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation by the Schuirmann’s two one-sided t tests and by Wilcoxon Mann Whitney two one-sided tests procedure. Therefore, the 2 formulations were considered to be equivalent. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 36 | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | https://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2010.58 | |
| dc.subject | Dipyridamole | en_US |
| dc.subject | Comparative bioavailability | en_US |
| dc.subject | Pharmacokinetic parameters | en_US |
| dc.subject | Bioequivalent | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparative Bioavailability of Two Tablet Formulations of Dipyridamole in Healthy Volunteers | en_US |
| dc.type | Text | en_US |
| dc.citation.volume | 2 | |
| dc.citation.issue | 4 | |
| dc.citation.spage | 213 | |
| dc.citation.epage | 216 | |