نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorNehaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVerma, Amiten_US
dc.contributor.authorKumar, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, I.en_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T06:37:39Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T06:37:39Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T06:37:39Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T06:37:39Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-01en_US
dc.date.issued1396-09-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2016-05-26en_US
dc.date.submitted1395-03-06fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationNeha, Verma, Amit, Kumar, A., Ahmed, I.. (2017). Comparative efficacy of serological diagnostic methods and evaluation of polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 18(4), 279-281. doi: 10.22099/ijvr.2017.4635en_US
dc.identifier.issn1728-1997
dc.identifier.issn2252-0589
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/ijvr.2017.4635
dc.identifier.urihttp://ijvr.shirazu.ac.ir/article_4635.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/306144
dc.description.abstractThe aim of present study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the different Brucella abortus antigen based serological and molecular tests such as Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Out of 89 samples, 44 were positive by I-ELISA, 18 by RBPT and 21 by PCR. Substantial agreement was observed between PCR and I-ELISA (κ=0.48). A slight degree of agreement was observed between RBPT and I-ELISA and PCR (κ=0.18) and RBPT and PCR (κ=0.11). Indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay detected more samples as positive among these tests. In conclusion, I-ELISA can be routinely used for an accurate and efficient diagnosis of Brucella infection, because the chances of non-detection of an infected animal in I-ELISA are minimal. However, PCR could be used as a supplement and complement test along with I-ELISA for identification and differentiation of bovine brucellosis.en_US
dc.format.extent157
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShiraz Universityen_US
dc.publisherمعاونت پژوهشی‌ دانشگاه شیرازfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofIranian Journal of Veterinary Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofمجله تحقیقات دامپزشکی ایرانfa_IR
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/ijvr.2017.4635
dc.subjectBovine Brucellosisen_US
dc.subjectI-ELISAen_US
dc.subjectPCRen_US
dc.subjectRBPTen_US
dc.titleComparative efficacy of serological diagnostic methods and evaluation of polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of bovine brucellosisen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeShort paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMVSc Scholar, Department of Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, U. P. Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura-281001, Uttar Pradesh, Indiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, U. P. Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura-281001, Uttar Pradesh, Indiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, U. P. Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura-281001, Uttar Pradesh, Indiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMVSc Scholar, Department of Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, U. P. Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura-281001, Uttar Pradesh, Indiaen_US
dc.citation.volume18
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.spage279
dc.citation.epage281


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد