نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorSharifian, Roxanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorShokrpour, Nasrinen_US
dc.contributor.authorSalehpour, Fahimehen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T04:25:52Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T04:25:52Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T04:25:52Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T04:25:52Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01en_US
dc.date.issued1393-10-11fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2014-12-30en_US
dc.date.submitted1393-10-09fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationSharifian, Roxana, Shokrpour, Nasrin, Salehpour, Fahimeh. (2015). Evaluation of the implementation of the knowledge management processes in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences teaching hospitals, 2014. Journal of Health Management & Informatics, 2(1), 9-13.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2322-1097
dc.identifier.issn2423-5857
dc.identifier.urihttps://jhmi.sums.ac.ir/article_42634.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/261346
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Recognition and implementation of knowledge management have an important effect on improving the quality of hospital activities. According to the direct relationship with the society’s health, health and treatment departments need knowledgeable and skillful staff. Thus, this research investigated different dimensions of the knowledge management processes in teaching hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2014.Method: This cross-sectional analytical study was performed on 103 top and middle-ranked managers of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences hospitals. The instrument was a valid and reliable questionnaire containing six knowledge management dimensions. Data were analyzed in SPSS software version 16, using the one-sample t-test and ANOVA.Results: The results of the study showed that among the processes of knowledge management dimensions, “acquisition and knowledge creation”(mean=3.2) and “strategy and policy of knowledge” (mean=3.13) had the highest ranks and “assessment and feedback of knowledge” (mean=2.86) and “knowledge sharing” (mean=2.61) were at the lowest levels. The comparison between these six dimensions demonstrated that there were significant relationships among “strategy and policy of knowledge” and “acquisition and knowledge creation” (p=0.047),“strategy and policy of knowledge” and “organizing and documenting of knowledge” (p=0.206), “organizing and documenting of knowledge” and “knowledge sharing” (p=0.259), “organizing and documenting of knowledge” and “use and reuse of knowledge” (p=0.325), “use and reuse of knowledge”, and “knowledge sharing” (p=0.100).Conclusion: According to the results, the conditions of “strategy and policy of knowledge” and “acquisition and knowledge creation” dimensions are at the average level and other dimensions of knowledge management processes are poor in teaching hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Considering the importance of knowledge management in improving the performance of the hospitals and achieving the organizational goals, applying all dimensions of knowledge management especially “knowledge sharing” and “assessment and feedback of knowledge” is vital.Keywords: Knowledge management, Knowledge management dimensions, Health care organizationsen_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShiraz University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Health Management & Informaticsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the implementation of the knowledge management processes in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences teaching hospitals, 2014en_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeArticlesen_US
dc.citation.volume2
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage9
dc.citation.epage13


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد