نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorBavand Savadkoohi, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTokhmechi, B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGloaguen, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArab-Amiri, A.R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T03:32:19Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T03:32:19Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T03:32:19Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T03:32:19Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.date.issued1397-10-11fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2018-08-07en_US
dc.date.submitted1397-05-16fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationBavand Savadkoohi, M., Tokhmechi, B., Gloaguen, E., Arab-Amiri, A.R.. (2019). A comprehensive benchmark between two filter-based multiple-point simulation algorithms. Journal of Mining and Environment, 10(1), 139-149. doi: 10.22044/jme.2018.7335.1584en_US
dc.identifier.issn2251-8592
dc.identifier.issn2251-8606
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22044/jme.2018.7335.1584
dc.identifier.urihttp://jme.shahroodut.ac.ir/article_1292.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/242755
dc.description.abstractComputer graphics offer various gadgets to enhance the reconstruction of high-order statistics that are not correctly addressed by the two-point statistics approaches. Almost all the newly developed multiple-point geostatistics (MPS) algorithms, to some extent, adapt these techniques to increase the simulation accuracy and efficiency. In this work, a scrutiny comparison between our recently developed MPS algorithm, the cross-correlation-wavelet simulation (CCWSIM), and a well-known MPS algorithm, FILTERSIM, is performed. The main motivation to benchmark these two algorithms is that both exploit some digital image processing filters for feature extraction. Indeed, both algorithms compute the similarity (or dissimilarity) between data events in simulation grid and training image in the feature space. In order to compare the accuracy of the algorithms, some statistics such as facies proportion, variogram, and connectivity function are computed. The results obtained reveal an excellent agreement of the CCWSIM realizations with the training image rather than FILTERSIM. Furthermore, on average, the required simulation runtime for CCWSIM is at least 10 times less than that for FILTERSIM.en_US
dc.format.extent2775
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShahrood University of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Mining and Environmenten_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22044/jme.2018.7335.1584
dc.subjectMultiple-Point Simulationen_US
dc.subjectFilter-Based Algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectGeostatistical Simulationen_US
dc.subjectFILTERSIM Algorithmen_US
dc.subjectCCWSIM Algorithmen_US
dc.subjectExploitationen_US
dc.titleA comprehensive benchmark between two filter-based multiple-point simulation algorithmsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeCase Studyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Mining, Petroleum & Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Mining, Petroleum & Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCentre Eau Terre Environnement, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Québec, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Mining, Petroleum & Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iranen_US
dc.citation.volume10
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage139
dc.citation.epage149
nlai.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1516-0624
nlai.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1721-7452


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد