نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorShokouhi, Hosseinen_US
dc.contributor.authorImari, Imanen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-09T00:44:06Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T00:44:06Z
dc.date.available1399-07-09T00:44:06Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-30T00:44:06Z
dc.date.issued2009-07-01en_US
dc.date.issued1388-04-10fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2012-07-16en_US
dc.date.submitted1391-04-26fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationShokouhi, Hossein, Imari, Iman. (2009). Anaphors in Casual and Controlled Talk groups of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 28(1), 75-97. doi: 10.22099/jtls.2012.203en_US
dc.identifier.issn2008-8191
dc.identifier.issn2717-1604
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2012.203
dc.identifier.urihttp://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_203.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/184305
dc.description.abstractBy relying mainly on the accessibility approach to anaphora, this article intends to analyze the types, distributions and retrieval of anaphors in two forms of spoken discourse: casual and controlled talk. For the specific purposes of the study, twenty sophomore Iranian students were randomly selected to conduct the talks. The subjects were divided into two groups of casual and controlled talk. According to the settings and adopted topics, the overall casual talk group was further divided into two groups of dorm and academic talk. In the end, it was observed that as the talk situations vary, types, frequencies, distances, retrieval qualities and thematic structure (patterning) of anaphors undergo dramatic changes too. Further analyses of the obtained data show that the number of pronominal anaphors is by far more than NP anaphors in dorm casual talk whereas in academic casual talk the number of NP anaphors exceeds that of the former talk groups. However, the distribution of anaphors in the performance of controlled talk groups has shown to be more moderate with regard to the types of anaphors used in it. Overall, the distributional patterns of various anaphoric devices in different talk situations are considered to be a function of the speakers' evaluation of the cognitive states of the listeners/addressees. Average distances and frequencies of the different types of zero, pronominal, and NP anaphors have also been shown to undergo dramatic changes as talk situations vary.en_US
dc.format.extent193
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShiraz Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Teaching Language Skillsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2012.203
dc.subject1. Anaphora 2. Casual Talk 3. Controlled Talk 4. Distribution 5. Topic 6. EFL Learners 7. Distance 8. Discourseen_US
dc.titleAnaphors in Casual and Controlled Talk groups of Iranian EFL Learnersen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentAssociate Professor of (Applied) Linguisticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentM.A. in TEFLen_US
dc.citation.volume28
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage75
dc.citation.epage97


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد