نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorYaghoobi, Claudiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-08T22:51:55Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T22:51:55Z
dc.date.available1399-07-08T22:51:55Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-29T22:51:55Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-01en_US
dc.date.issued1391-01-13fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2012-08-24en_US
dc.date.submitted1391-06-03fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationYaghoobi, Claudia. (2012). Against the Current: Farid al-Din ‘Attar’s Diverse Voices. Persian Literary Studies Journal, 1(1), 87-109. doi: 10.22099/jps.2013.604en_US
dc.identifier.issn2322-2557
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jps.2013.604
dc.identifier.urihttp://plsj.shirazu.ac.ir/article_604.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/141906
dc.description.abstractLove and its transformative power have long been at the center of Islamic Sufism. For Sufi writers profane love, perceived as the love of worldly beloved, was the first step on the path toward the union with the divine. Farid al-Din ‘Attar (1145-1221) was one of the most significant authors to espouse and articulate profane love as a representation of both earthly and heavenly love. 'Attar's use of the theme of transgressive love and his inclusion of marginalized members of society such as social pariahs and transgressors as earthly manifestations of the divine is particularly noteworthy. The present article traces the intersections of transgression, law, inclusion and exclusion, self and Other in ‘Attar's treatment of class, gender, sexuality, and religion. In creating an understanding of human diversity and 'Attar's inclusiveness, this article refers to the concepts of law and justice in its modern sense as well as acknowledging the medieval understanding of these notions. In pursuing this argument, a few theoretical notions concerning transgression and law are used. Although applying modern theories to medieval society might appear anachronistic, it is essential to inquire whether modern insights and theories can help us to better understand medieval works, or whether they are exclusive to early modern and modern scholarship. Without such an analysis, we are left with an inadequate understanding of medieval culture and literature. This article fills this gap by exploring the reasons for ‘Attar's inclusion of transgressors and peripheral characters in his works from a modern theoretical perspective.en_US
dc.format.extent270
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShiraz Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPersian Literary Studies Journalen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jps.2013.604
dc.subjectFarid al-Din ‘Attaren_US
dc.subjectLoveen_US
dc.subjectSelf & Otheren_US
dc.subjectTransgressionen_US
dc.titleAgainst the Current: Farid al-Din ‘Attar’s Diverse Voicesen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeResearch Papersen_US
dc.contributor.departmentComparative Literature PhD Candidate University of California, Santa Barbara, USAen_US
dc.citation.volume1
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage87
dc.citation.epage109


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد