نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorKalanzadeh, Gholamen_US
dc.contributor.authorJafarigohar, Manoochehren_US
dc.contributor.authorGhonsooly, Behzaden_US
dc.contributor.authorSoleimani, Hassanen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-07-08T22:13:42Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T22:13:42Z
dc.date.available1399-07-08T22:13:42Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-09-29T22:13:42Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-01en_US
dc.date.issued1397-01-12fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2018-01-28en_US
dc.date.submitted1396-11-08fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationKalanzadeh, Gholam, Jafarigohar, Manoochehr, Ghonsooly, Behzad, Soleimani, Hassan. (2018). Mixed Effects of Input Enhancement, Explicit Instruction, Corrective Feedback, and Pushed Output in an Input-Output Mapping Practice. Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 57-82. doi: 10.22055/rals.2018.13405en_US
dc.identifier.issn2345-3303
dc.identifier.issn2588-3887
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.22055/rals.2018.13405
dc.identifier.urihttp://rals.scu.ac.ir/article_13405.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/127819
dc.description.abstractThis investigation examined the mixed effects of visual input enhancement, explicit instruction, pushed output, and corrective feedback on noticing and intake of English conjunctive adverbs. Participants included 83 intermediate EFL students enrolled in a grammar and writing course. They were assigned to a control group (<em>n</em> = 22), explicit instruction + pushed output + explicit corrective feedback group (<em>n</em> = 25), visual input enhancement + pushed output + implicit corrective feedback group (<em>n </em>= 17), and visual input enhancement + enriched input group (<em>n</em> = 19). Design was a pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest type. To assess the participants' intake of the targeted structures, 3 tests were developed. One-way ANOVA and a series of post-hoc Scheffe tests were performed on the results. Taken together, the results indicated that all the combined procedures had both positive and lasting effects on the noticing and subsequent intake of the discourse markers (conjunctive adverbs) at issue. Results, further, revealed that the effects of the mixed procedures on the rate and durability of intake of the targeted forms was differential.en_US
dc.format.extent593
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherShahid Chamran University of Ahvazen_US
dc.relation.ispartofResearch in Applied Linguisticsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.22055/rals.2018.13405
dc.subjectForm-focused instruction (FFI)en_US
dc.subjectexplicit instruction (EI)en_US
dc.subjectvisual input enhancement (VIE)en_US
dc.subjectPushed Output (PO)en_US
dc.subjectExplicit Corrective Feedback (ECF)en_US
dc.subjectimplicit corrective feedback (ICF)en_US
dc.titleMixed Effects of Input Enhancement, Explicit Instruction, Corrective Feedback, and Pushed Output in an Input-Output Mapping Practiceen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of TEFL and English Literature, Payame Noor University, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of TEFL and English Literature, Payame Noor University, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Applied Linguistics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iranen_US
dc.contributor.department5Department of TEFL and English Literature, Payame Noor University, Iranen_US
dc.citation.volume9
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage57
dc.citation.epage82


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد