• ثبت نام
    • ورود به سامانه
    مشاهده مورد 
    •   صفحهٔ اصلی
    • نشریات انگلیسی
    • Journal of Medicinal plants and By-product
    • Volume 14, Issue 3
    • مشاهده مورد
    •   صفحهٔ اصلی
    • نشریات انگلیسی
    • Journal of Medicinal plants and By-product
    • Volume 14, Issue 3
    • مشاهده مورد
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison of the Effect of α-Pinene and Gallic Acid on Tyrosinase Activity

    (ندگان)پدیدآور
    Zarei, Mohammad AliMohammad Ali Rasul, shazhir
    Thumbnail
    دریافت مدرک مشاهده
    FullText
    اندازه فایل: 
    1.054 مگابایت
    نوع فايل (MIME): 
    PDF
    نوع مدرک
    Text
    Research Paper
    زبان مدرک
    English
    نمایش کامل رکورد
    چکیده
    Tyrosinase is the key enzyme in melanin synthesis. Therefore, many Tyrosinase inhibitors have been tested in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. The aim of this study was to compare the anti-Tyrosinase potential of Gallic acid and α-Pinene. The initial analysis was conducted using molecular docking methods. Then, laboratory experiments were performed using mushroom Tyrosinase, with catechol as the substrate and Kojic acid as the standard inhibitor of the enzyme. The antioxidant activity of Gallic acid and α-Pinene was evaluated using DPPH radicals. Docking scores showed that Gallic acid has a strong binding affinity towards Tyrosinase (ΔG = -6.33 Kcal/mol) forming an H-bond with Met 280 and a pi-pi stacking with His 263. α-Pinene could only bind to the active pocket via hydrophobic interactions, resulting in a lower binding affinity (ΔG = ˗3.89 Kcal/mol). Gallic acid showed the highest inhibitory effect (IC50 = 0.130 mg/mL), whereas α-Pinene showed a lower inhibitory capacity (IC50 = 0.392 mg/mL). The types of inhibition were competitive inhibition for Kojic acid and uncompetitive inhibition for Gallic acid. In the DPPH radical scavenging test, EC50 value for Gallic acid and α-Pinene was 0.269 mg/mL and 251.2 mg/mL, respectively. Both in silico and laboratory results were nearly identical. While α- Pinene is not as powerful an inhibitor of Tyrosinase as Gallic acid is, its effect will be increased perhaps by increasing its concentration. The anti-oxidant potential of Gallic acid is significantly higher than that of α-Pinene, so from this point of view also Gallic acid is more harmless and applicable with a higher degree of safeness.
    کلید واژگان
    Tyrosinase
    α-pinene
    gallic acid
    Melanin
    Phytochemistry

    شماره نشریه
    3
    تاریخ نشر
    2025-05-01
    1404-02-11
    ناشر
    Iranian Medicinal Plants Society
    سازمان پدید آورنده
    Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
    Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

    شاپا
    2322-1399
    2588-3739
    URI
    https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/jmpb.2024.367021.1761
    https://jmpb.areeo.ac.ir/article_132443.html
    https://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/1167177

    مرور

    همه جای سامانهپایگاه‌ها و مجموعه‌ها بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌هااین مجموعه بر اساس تاریخ انتشارپدیدآورانعناوینموضوع‌‌ها

    حساب من

    ورود به سامانهثبت نام

    آمار

    مشاهده آمار استفاده

    تازه ترین ها

    تازه ترین مدارک
    © کليه حقوق اين سامانه برای سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی ایران محفوظ است
    تماس با ما | ارسال بازخورد
    قدرت یافته توسطسیناوب