نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorعليرضا اسفندياري مقدمen_US
dc.contributor.authorزهره بهاري موفقen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-12-04T14:10:06Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-22T14:10:16Z
dc.date.available1399-12-04T14:10:06Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2021-02-22T14:10:16Z
dc.date.issued2012-06-06en_US
dc.date.issued1391-03-17fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2012-06-06en_US
dc.date.submitted1391-03-17fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(1391). مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت, 9(2)fa_IR
dc.identifier.issn1735-7853
dc.identifier.issn1735-9813
dc.identifier.urihttp://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/616
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/765458
dc.description.abstractBackground: Knowing the rate of overlapping in results obtained from information retrieval tools is important to prevent waste of time. Medical and health-related information has an outstanding place among the variety of information available on the Internet. Hence, this research aimed to study the rate of overlap among medical search results derived from MESH (medical subject headings) in general search engines. Methods: This applied, descriptive, comparative approach survey was conducted in 2010. The research sample included 4 general search engines, i.e. Yahoo, Live Search, Google, and Ask. In order to determine the rate of overlapping among the searches, 10 medical keywords were first selected randomly. The first 10 results retrieved by each search engine were then listed. Finally, the overlap rate was calculated by means of Microsoft Excel. To determine the overlapping search results, 10 common terms were searched in the mentioned search engines. Then, 10 results retrieved in the first page of each search engine were collected and compared. The overlap rate among the retrieved results was finally calculated using a checklist and a researcher-made equation whose validity was confirmed based on observations of the researchers, comments of some expert professors, and especially referring to related literature. In addition, due to the descriptive, comparative approach of the research, descriptive statistics revolving around a statistical equation was utilized.   Results: It was found that search engines can retrieve 48% of relevant searches retrieved by other search engines. Yahoo had the highest number of unique results while Google had the highest number of results overlapping with other search engines. The overlap rate of the 4 studied search engines was 11%. Conclusion: The results obtained from different search engines hardly overlap. Therefore, users are suggested to search more than one search engine simultaneously to access more relevant documents. Moreover, they are advised to use specialized search engines to search medical information. Keywords: Internet; Information Retrieval; Keywords; Search Engineen_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهانfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofمدیریت اطلاعات سلامتfa_IR
dc.titleمیزان هم‌پوشانی نتایج بازیابی شده‌ی كلیدواژه‌های تخصصی پزشكی در موتورهای كاوش عمومی وبen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentاستاديار، علوم کتابداري و اطلاع‌رساني، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد همدان، همدان، ايرانen_US
dc.contributor.departmentدانشجوي کارشناسي ارشد، علوم کتابداري و اطلاع‌رساني، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد همدان، همدان، ايرانen_US
dc.citation.volume9
dc.citation.issue2


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد