نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorمريم احمديen_US
dc.contributor.authorعلي ماهرen_US
dc.contributor.authorمحمد حسين حيوي حقيقيen_US
dc.contributor.authorجهان‌پور علي‌پورen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-12-02T04:47:13Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-20T04:47:23Z
dc.date.available1399-12-02T04:47:13Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2021-02-20T04:47:23Z
dc.date.issued2012-02-04en_US
dc.date.issued1390-11-15fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2012-02-04en_US
dc.date.submitted1390-11-15fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(1390). مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت, 0(0)fa_IR
dc.identifier.issn1735-7853
dc.identifier.issn1735-9813
dc.identifier.urihttp://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/488
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/749322
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The goal of every healthcare risk management program is to reduce the possibility of undesired events for patients. Such programs include identifying undesired events, analyzing their causes, estimating the possibility of outbreak and their results and taking proper actions to prevent their recurrence. The goal of this study was to compare healthcare risk management programs in selected countries and to propose a model for Iran. Methods:   This descriptive-comparative study included England, the USA and Australia. National Health Services (NHS), Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health care Organization (JCAHO) and Medical Defenses Association of Victoria (MDAV) were selected as samples (because of functionality scope). Available information through the Internet, email and library references were used to collect data. Data was analyzed by comparative tables and descriptive statistical methods. The final model was prepared based on the performed analyses and after obtaining the viewpoints of related specialists. Results: There were numerous common points between the risk management process and documentation principles while few were observed in informed consent gathering principles. On the other hand, many differences were found among data elements in incident report forms. JCAHO gave more roles to medical record managers. Conclusion: Despite common points in risk management principles, each sample had mainly focused on needs and infrastructures of care delivery in their country. Key words: Risk Management; Healthcare; Information Management.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهانfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofمدیریت اطلاعات سلامتfa_IR
dc.titleبررسی تطبیقی برنامه‌ی مدیریت خطر در مراقبت سلامت در کشورهای منتخب و ارایه‌ی الگو برای ایرانen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentدانشيار، مديريت اطلاعات بهداشتي درماني، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي تهران، تهران، ايران.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentدانشيار، مديريت خدمات بهداشتي درماني، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي تهران، تهران، ايرانen_US
dc.contributor.departmentمربي، مدارک پزشکي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ايرانen_US
dc.contributor.departmentمربي، مدارک پزشکي، دانشگاه علوم پزشکي هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ايرانen_US
dc.citation.volume0
dc.citation.issue0


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد