نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorرضا صالح‌زادهen_US
dc.contributor.authorسعيده کتابيen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-12-02T04:11:40Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-20T04:11:50Z
dc.date.available1399-12-02T04:11:40Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2021-02-20T04:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2011-10-06en_US
dc.date.issued1390-07-14fa_IR
dc.date.submitted2011-10-06en_US
dc.date.submitted1390-07-14fa_IR
dc.identifier.citation(1390). مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت, 8(4)fa_IR
dc.identifier.issn1735-7853
dc.identifier.issn1735-9813
dc.identifier.urihttp://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/333
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/749182
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Due to increased costs of health sector, much effort has been done to compare the performance of hospitals and measure their efficiency in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative efficiency of public and private hospitals in Qom during 2007 using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Methods: This was an applied and analytic study. The study population included all the 8 hospitals in Qom. There was no need to assess the validity and reliability since real data and performance statistics of hospitals were used. Input variables in this study were number of general practitioners, specialist physicians, and paramedical staff, as well as number of active beds.  Output variables included number of inpatients and outpatients admitted. First, input variables weighted by analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and reduced to two variables, namely number of physicians and number of active beds.  Then, input-oriented CCR (constant returns to scale (CRS)) and BCC (variable returns to scale (VRS)) were used to assess the performance of Qom hospitals in 2007. After determining inefficient hospitals, efficient hospitals were ranked using Anderson-Peterson (AP) model. Expert Choice, Win4Deap and DEA-Master were used to perform the calculations. Results: CCR model indicated 3 hospitals as efficient and five hospitals as inefficient. The final ranking of hospitals based on this model was 1. Zahra; 2. Fatemi; 3. Izadi; 4. Vali-e-Asr; 5.Masoomeh; 6. Nekooyi; 7. Kamkar; and 8. Golpaygani. However, based on BCC model, four hospitals were efficient and four were inefficient. The final ranking was 1. Zahra; 2. Vali-e-Asr; 3. Izadi; 4. Fatemi; 5. Masoomeh; 6. Nekooyi; 7. Kamkar; and 8. Golpaygani. Conclusion: Most hospitals are not efficient. The performance of inefficient hospitals can be improved following the patterns used by reference hospitals and also by better financial and human resources management. Keywords: Hospitals; Analysis; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Performance Assessment.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherدانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهانfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofمدیریت اطلاعات سلامتfa_IR
dc.titleارزیابی کارایی نسبی بیمارستان‌های قم با استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها و فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبیen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentدانشجوي كارشناسي ارشد، مديريت صنعتي، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ايران.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentاستاديار، تحقيق در عمليات، عضو مرکز تحقيقات مديريت و اقتصاد سلامت دانشگاه علوم پزشکي اصفهان، اصفهان، ايرانen_US
dc.citation.volume8
dc.citation.issue4


فایل‌های این مورد

فایل‌هااندازهقالبمشاهده

فایلی با این مورد مرتبط نشده است.

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد