نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorMansouri, Saraen_US
dc.contributor.authorHadian, Bahramen_US
dc.contributor.authorTabatabaei, Omiden_US
dc.contributor.authorRezvani, Ehsanen_US
dc.date.accessioned1399-08-23T17:14:36Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T17:14:37Z
dc.date.available1399-08-23T17:14:36Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-11-13T17:14:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-01en_US
dc.date.issued1397-06-10fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationMansouri, Sara, Hadian, Bahram, Tabatabaei, Omid, Rezvani, Ehsan. (2018). The Assessment of Pragmatic Knowledge in the Online General IELTS-Practice Resources: A Corpus Analysis of Writing Tasks. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 133-162.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-1634
dc.identifier.urihttp://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2938-en.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/625657
dc.description.abstractMotivated by the concept of Communicative Language Ability and the eminence of the IELTS exam, this study intended to scrutinize the representation of functional knowledge (FK) and socio-linguistic knowledge (SK) as sub-components of pragmatic knowledge in the writing performances of both tasks of the online General IELTS-practice resources across three band scores. This quantitative inter-scores/intra-tasks and inter-tasks investigation aimed to reveal firstly whether the writers of three band scores 7, 8, and 9 differed from each other in their FK and SK level, and secondly whether the tasks differed in activating them. This study adopted a taxonomy of five illocutionary acts and 20 register features to investigate representation of FK and SK in a well-established corpus of 180 writing performances through both manual analysis and Multidimensional Analysis Tagger software. While the results of statistical analyses revealed no FK differences between the bands in task one (T1), T2’s higher bands involved more functional features because of the expression of a diverse range of psychological states, no speaker’s involvement, and less commitment to a future course of actions. Furthermore, socio-linguistically, band 9 scripts encompassed more logical relations, but conversational and spoken style in T1 and more integration, less simplified structures and ego-involvement in T2. The inter-task analyses uncovered T1’s greater activation of FK through self-mentions, others involvement, emotion, and intention expression. Nevertheless, when it came to SK register features, T2 overdid in both spoken and written genre elements except in persuasion, writers’ involvement, mental acts expression, and interactive discourse creation.en_US
dc.format.extent684
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTehran, Kharazmi Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIranian Journal of Applied Linguisticsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofزبانشناسی کاربردیfa_IR
dc.subjectBand scoreen_US
dc.subjectFunctional knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectGeneral IELTSen_US
dc.subjectPragmatic knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectRegisteren_US
dc.subjectSociolinguistic knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectTask oneen_US
dc.subjectTask twoen_US
dc.subjectWritingen_US
dc.subjectSpecialen_US
dc.titleThe Assessment of Pragmatic Knowledge in the Online General IELTS-Practice Resources: A Corpus Analysis of Writing Tasksen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeResearchen_US
dc.citation.volume21
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage133
dc.citation.epage162


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد