نمایش مختصر رکورد

dc.contributor.authorاصلانی, فرزینfa_IR
dc.contributor.authorعمرانی, علی رضاfa_IR
dc.contributor.authorفیض بخش, مسعودfa_IR
dc.contributor.authorغفاری, روشنکfa_IR
dc.contributor.authorثبوتی, فرهادfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned1399-08-23T01:29:04Zfa_IR
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T01:29:04Z
dc.date.available1399-08-23T01:29:04Zfa_IR
dc.date.available2020-11-13T01:29:04Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-01en_US
dc.date.issued1393-04-10fa_IR
dc.identifier.citationاصلانی, فرزین, عمرانی, علی رضا, فیض بخش, مسعود, غفاری, روشنک, ثبوتی, فرهاد. (1393). مقایسه تفاوت لندمارک های آناتومیک دو تکنیک رادیوگرافی لترال سفالومتری دیجیتال و معمولی به روش ترسیم دستی در جمجمه های انسانی. مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مازندران, 24(114), 36-43.fa_IR
dc.identifier.issn1735-9260
dc.identifier.issn1735-9279
dc.identifier.urihttp://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-3928-fa.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/123456789/561824
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: Digital radiography has led to many improvements in radiology. Despite many advantages there are different ideas in determining anatomical landmarks which results in some errors in cephalometric analyses. The aim of this study was to determine the degree of identification differences of anatomical landmarks by conventional and digital lateral cephalometric techniques using manual tracing of human skulls. Material and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 17 cases of human skulls in which metal radiopaque markers were attached to 9 landmarks as follows: N, S, ANS, PNS, A, B, Pog, the most inferior point of lower mandibular border, and Go. Conventional and digital lateral cephalograms were obtained from each skull with and without markers. The two cephalograms without markers were traced for landmarks by three orthodontists. Any difference between these landmarks and those of cephalograms with markers, were recorded and analyzed by student t-test. Results: The level of differences in S point was not statistically significant along both x and y coordinates. The measurement differences for the ANS and PNS points obtained by both radiographic methods were significant along the x coordinate but not significant along the y coordinate. Also, the measurement differences for the most inferior point of lower mandibular border, A, B, and Go points along both x and y coordinates were observed to be statistically significant. The measurement difference obtained for the Pog point was significant along the y coordinate and non-significant along the x coordinate. Conclusion:The difference in landmark identification between the two digital and conventional lateral cephalometric techniques was statistically significant for some points on both dimensions, however, the difference was not clinically significant.fa_IR
dc.format.extent169
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageفارسی
dc.language.isofa_IR
dc.publisherدانشگاه علوم پزشکی مازندرانfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofمجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مازندرانfa_IR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectلندمارک‌های آناتومیکfa_IR
dc.subjectسفالومتریfa_IR
dc.subjectرادیوگرافی دیجیتالfa_IR
dc.titleمقایسه تفاوت لندمارک های آناتومیک دو تکنیک رادیوگرافی لترال سفالومتری دیجیتال و معمولی به روش ترسیم دستی در جمجمه های انسانیfa_IR
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.typeپژوهشي-کاملfa_IR
dc.contributor.departmentعلوم پزشکی مازندرانfa_IR
dc.contributor.departmentعلوم پزشکی مازندرانfa_IR
dc.contributor.departmentعلوم پزشکی مازندرانfa_IR
dc.contributor.departmentعلوم پزشکی مازندرانfa_IR
dc.contributor.departmentعلوم پزشکی مازندرانfa_IR
dc.citation.volume24
dc.citation.issue114
dc.citation.spage36
dc.citation.epage43


فایل‌های این مورد

Thumbnail

این مورد در مجموعه‌های زیر وجود دارد:

نمایش مختصر رکورد